Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Should CosyPoseWapper go? #121

Open
MedericFourmy opened this issue Jan 23, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Should CosyPoseWapper go? #121

MedericFourmy opened this issue Jan 23, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@MedericFourmy
Copy link
Collaborator

CosyPoseWapper was included as a high level interface in the project to ease CosyPose models setup. Megapose uses a different method by defining a load_named_model function defined in happypose/toolbox/utils.

Should we uniformize to megapose option?
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@MedericFourmy