[SJTC] Make scaling interface optional #1145
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This way, the controller can be used on systems, where no scaling interface is available (e.g. GZ). The upstream version in ros2_controllers will have the same behavior.
VinDp
force-pushed
the
sjtc_without_scaling
branch
from
fd546b5
to
b54ca5e
Compare
VinDp
approved these changes
Oct 14, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This way, the controller can be used on systems, where no scaling interface is available (e.g. GZ). The upstream version in ros2_controllers will have the same behavior.
This is a part of fixing UniversalRobots/Universal_Robots_ROS2_GZ_Simulation#57