[luci-interpreter] Add RmsNorm to loader #14082
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This commit adds RmsNorm to luci-interpreter loader ONE-DCO-1.0-Signed-off-by: Seockho Kim [email protected]
This commit adds RmsNorm to linux kernel build list ONE-DCO-1.0-Signed-off-by: Seockho Kim [email protected]
seockho-kim
force-pushed
the
luci_interpreter_loader_rmsnorm
branch
from
f31bef5
to
a2ed7c5
Compare
seockho-kim
commented
Sep 26, 2024
| @@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ REGISTER_KERNEL(Reshape) | |||
| REGISTER_KERNEL(ResizeBilinear) | |||
| REGISTER_KERNEL(ResizeNearestNeighbor) | |||
| REGISTER_KERNEL(ReverseV2) | |||
| REGISTER_KERNEL(RmsNorm) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It was submitted as another PR.
But, added here because of link error.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This commit adds RmsNorm to luci-interpreter loader
ONE-DCO-1.0-Signed-off-by: Seockho Kim [email protected]
issue: #13964
draft: #13967