Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Check PHQ-9 #74

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
May 24, 2024
Merged

Check PHQ-9 #74

merged 10 commits into from
May 24, 2024

Conversation

ibevers
Copy link
Contributor

@ibevers ibevers commented May 3, 2024

@ibevers ibevers changed the title Remove extra item and question marks Check PHQ-9 May 5, 2024
@ibevers ibevers marked this pull request as draft May 5, 2024 16:00
@ibevers
Copy link
Contributor Author

ibevers commented May 9, 2024

Screenshot 2024-05-09 at 6 37 38 PM New validation passes

@ibevers ibevers marked this pull request as ready for review May 9, 2024 22:37
@satra
Copy link
Contributor

satra commented May 10, 2024

@ibevers - item 10 should not be removed. that's in the PHQ9. the APA reference is not the primary reference for PHQ9. it may be useful to track down the original reference/paper for these instruments.

@satra
Copy link
Contributor

satra commented May 10, 2024

the APA version says: "Adapted from Patient Health Questionnaire—9 (PHQ-9) for research and evaluation purposes". we do want the questionnaires to be as they were published. one could create an APA version of PHQ9, but we should not need to.

@ibevers
Copy link
Contributor Author

ibevers commented May 10, 2024

@satra Okay, I will track down the original and update accordingly.

@ibevers
Copy link
Contributor Author

ibevers commented May 15, 2024

@satra here is the original paper, as far as I can tell:
PHQ9_paper_spitzer1999.pdf

@ibevers
Copy link
Contributor Author

ibevers commented May 15, 2024

@satra
Screenshot 2024-05-15 at 2 37 19 PM

@ibevers
Copy link
Contributor Author

ibevers commented May 15, 2024

Screenshot 2024-05-15 at 2 46 42 PM

@satra
Copy link
Contributor

satra commented May 15, 2024

when you have a link can you add it to the citation for the activity schema? i just filed an issue to update the citation key.

@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
{
"@context": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ReproNim/reproschema/1.0.0-rc4/contexts/generic",
"@context": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ReproNim/reproschema/1.0.0-rc1/contexts/generic",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this switched back to rc1, here and elsewhere.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Resolved

@ibevers
Copy link
Contributor Author

ibevers commented May 15, 2024

when you have a link can you add it to the citation for the activity schema? I just filed an issue to update the citation key.

@satra Currently, the citation value must be a string. Are you saying that resolution of the issue will allow lists of citations and that I should append the citation I found to the list when that is allowed?

I didn't see your issue on: https://github.com/ReproNim/reproschema
Where is it?

@satra
Copy link
Contributor

satra commented May 15, 2024

ReproNim/reproschema#456 (comment)

@ibevers
Copy link
Contributor Author

ibevers commented May 15, 2024

@satra here is the original paper, as far as I can tell: PHQ9_paper_spitzer1999.pdf

This paper included questions about anxiety as well as the PHQ-9 questions, so I am not updating the citation, even though it is earlier than the 2001 paper where the PHQ-9 was used separately.

@satra
Copy link
Contributor

satra commented May 15, 2024

@ibevers
Copy link
Contributor Author

ibevers commented May 15, 2024

use this: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1495268/

That is the one being used.

@satra satra merged commit 96f3bb7 into ReproNim:enh/rc4 May 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants