Implemented Reply functionality for DirectChat and GroupChat #2420
Conversation
…into chat-feature
…o reply-functionality
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessWe have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team. Testing Your CodePlease make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if these conditions occur:
The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
WalkthroughThe update introduces the ability to reply to messages in both direct and group chats by adding an optional Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (17)
- schema.graphql (1 hunks)
- src/constants.ts (1 hunks)
- src/models/DirectChatMessage.ts (2 hunks)
- src/models/GroupChatMessage.ts (2 hunks)
- src/resolvers/DirectChatMessage/index.ts (1 hunks)
- src/resolvers/DirectChatMessage/replyTo.ts (1 hunks)
- src/resolvers/GroupChatMessage/index.ts (1 hunks)
- src/resolvers/GroupChatMessage/replyTo.ts (1 hunks)
- src/resolvers/Mutation/sendMessageToDirectChat.ts (1 hunks)
- src/resolvers/Mutation/sendMessageToGroupChat.ts (1 hunks)
- src/typeDefs/mutations.ts (1 hunks)
- src/typeDefs/types.ts (2 hunks)
- src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts (5 hunks)
- tests/helpers/directChat.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/helpers/groupChat.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/resolvers/DirectChatMessage/replyTo.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/resolvers/GroupChatMessage/replyTo.spec.ts (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (32)
src/resolvers/GroupChatMessage/index.ts (1)
3-3: Verify the correct implementation and usage ofreplyTo.The
replyToresolver function is newly added. Ensure that it is correctly implemented and used in the codebase.Also applies to: 9-9
Verification successful
The
replyTofunction is correctly implemented and used.The
replyToresolver function forGroupChatMessageis correctly implemented insrc/resolvers/GroupChatMessage/replyTo.tsand properly used in the codebase. The function is also well-tested intests/resolvers/GroupChatMessage/replyTo.spec.ts.
- Implementation:
src/resolvers/GroupChatMessage/replyTo.ts- Usage:
src/resolvers/GroupChatMessage/index.ts- Tests:
tests/resolvers/GroupChatMessage/replyTo.spec.tsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation and usage of the `replyTo` function. # Test: Search for the implementation of `replyTo`. Expect: Only one implementation. rg --type ts -A 5 $'export const replyTo' # Test: Search for the usage of `replyTo`. Expect: No incorrect usage. rg --type ts -A 5 $'replyTo'Length of output: 16636
src/resolvers/DirectChatMessage/index.ts (1)
4-4: Verify the correct implementation and usage ofreplyTo.The
replyToresolver function is newly added. Ensure that it is correctly implemented and used in the codebase.Also applies to: 11-11
Verification successful
The
replyTofunction is correctly implemented and used.The
replyTofunction has been implemented in bothsrc/resolvers/GroupChatMessage/replyTo.tsandsrc/resolvers/DirectChatMessage/replyTo.ts. It is correctly imported and used in the respective resolver files and has corresponding test cases verifying its functionality.
src/resolvers/GroupChatMessage/replyTo.tssrc/resolvers/DirectChatMessage/replyTo.tstests/resolvers/GroupChatMessage/replyTo.spec.tstests/resolvers/DirectChatMessage/replyTo.spec.tsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation and usage of the `replyTo` function. # Test: Search for the implementation of `replyTo`. Expect: Only one implementation. rg --type ts -A 5 $'export const replyTo' # Test: Search for the usage of `replyTo`. Expect: No incorrect usage. rg --type ts -A 5 $'replyTo'Length of output: 16636
src/resolvers/GroupChatMessage/replyTo.ts (1)
10-28: LGTM! Ensure the error handling is comprehensive.The function handles errors well by throwing a
NotFoundErrorif the message is not found.src/resolvers/DirectChatMessage/replyTo.ts (1)
10-31: LGTM!The function is well-structured and handles the presence and absence of the
replyTofield correctly. It also includes proper error handling.src/resolvers/Mutation/sendMessageToDirectChat.ts (1)
51-51: LGTM!The addition of the
replyToparameter is well-integrated into the function. Ensure that all necessary validations and error handling are in place for this new parameter.tests/helpers/groupChat.ts (2)
49-60: LGTM!The integration of the new
createGroupChatMessagefunction is well-done, and the handling of thereplyTofield is appropriate. Ensure that all necessary validations and error handling are in place for thereplyTofield.
69-81: LGTM!The new function
createGroupChatMessageis well-structured and improves code modularity and reusability.tests/resolvers/GroupChatMessage/replyTo.spec.ts (3)
15-23: LGTM! Setup and teardown methods are correctly implemented.The
beforeAllandafterAllhooks are correctly used to manage the database connection.
25-38: LGTM! The first test case is well-structured and verifies the expected behavior.The test case correctly checks if the
replyToresolver returns the correctGroupChatMessageobject forparent.groupChatMessageBelongsTo.
Line range hint
39-71:
LGTM! The second test case is well-structured and verifies the error handling behavior.The test case correctly checks if the
replyToresolver throws aNotFoundErrorwhen noreplyToexists.src/resolvers/Mutation/sendMessageToGroupChat.ts (1)
67-67: LGTM! ThereplyToproperty is correctly integrated into the mutation resolver.The addition of the
replyToproperty aligns with the objective of enabling threaded conversations.However, ensure that all function calls to
sendMessageToGroupChatcorrectly include thereplyToparameter where necessary.tests/resolvers/DirectChatMessage/replyTo.spec.ts (3)
15-23: LGTM! Setup and teardown methods are correctly implemented.The
beforeAllandafterAllhooks are correctly used to manage the database connection.
25-44: LGTM! The first test case is well-structured and verifies the expected behavior.The test case correctly checks if the
replyToresolver returns the correctDirectChatMessageobject forparent.directChatMessageBelongsTo.
45-71: LGTM! The second test case is well-structured and verifies the error handling behavior.The test case correctly checks if the
replyToresolver throws aNotFoundErrorwhen noreplyToexists.src/models/DirectChatMessage.ts (2)
15-15: Approved: Addition ofreplyTofield inInterfaceDirectChatMessage.The
replyTofield is correctly added as an optionalPopulatedDocof typeInterfaceDirectChatMessage & Document.
49-53: Approved: Addition ofreplyTofield indirectChatMessageSchema.The
replyTofield is correctly added as an optional reference toDirectChatMessage.src/models/GroupChatMessage.ts (2)
16-16: Approved: Addition ofreplyTofield inInterfaceGroupChatMessage.The
replyTofield is correctly added as an optionalPopulatedDocof typeInterfaceGroupChatMessage & Document.
43-47: Approved: Addition ofreplyTofield ingroupChatMessageSchema.The
replyTofield is correctly added as an optional reference toGroupChatMessage.tests/helpers/directChat.ts (2)
48-53: Approved: Addition ofdirectChatMessagecreation and its reference inreplyTo.The
directChatMessageis correctly created and referenced in thereplyTofield of thetestDirectChatMessage.
59-59: Approved: Addition ofreplyTofield intestDirectChatMessage.The
replyTofield is correctly added to thetestDirectChatMessagecreation.src/typeDefs/mutations.ts (2)
253-253: LGTM! But verify the usage of the newreplyToparameter.The addition of the
replyToparameter enhances the functionality. Ensure that all invocations ofsendMessageToDirectChatare updated to handle this new parameter.
259-259: LGTM! But verify the usage of the newreplyToparameter.The addition of the
replyToparameter enhances the functionality. Ensure that all invocations ofsendMessageToGroupChatare updated to handle this new parameter.Verification successful
LGTM! The
replyToparameter is correctly implemented in thesendMessageToGroupChatmutation.The parameter is properly utilized when creating a new
GroupChatMessage, ensuring the functionality for message replies is in place.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new `replyTo` parameter in `sendMessageToGroupChat`. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type graphql -A 5 $'sendMessageToGroupChat'Length of output: 79
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new `replyTo` parameter in `sendMessageToGroupChat`. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg -A 5 'sendMessageToGroupChat'Length of output: 15711
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the implementation of the sendMessageToGroupChat function to verify the usage of the new replyTo parameter. # Test: Extract the function implementation. Expect: Detailed implementation to verify parameter usage. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'export const sendMessageToGroupChat: MutationResolvers["sendMessageToGroupChat"] = $_' --jsonLength of output: 4479
src/typeDefs/types.ts (2)
194-194: LGTM! But verify the usage of the newreplyTofield.The addition of the
replyTofield enhances the schema. Ensure that all usages ofDirectChatMessageare updated to handle this new field.Verification successful
LGTM! The
replyTofield is properly integrated and used throughout the codebase.
- The
replyTofield is present in the GraphQL schema definitions.- It is included in the TypeScript types and Mongoose models.
- Resolvers and tests have been updated to handle the new field.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new `replyTo` field in `DirectChatMessage`. # Test: Search for the type usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new field. rg --type graphql -A 5 $'DirectChatMessage'Length of output: 74
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new `replyTo` field in `DirectChatMessage`. # Test: Search for the type usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new field. rg 'DirectChatMessage' -A 5Length of output: 107142
389-389: LGTM! But verify the usage of the newreplyTofield.The addition of the
replyTofield enhances the schema. Ensure that all usages ofGroupChatMessageare updated to handle this new field.Verification successful
The
replyTofield is appropriately handled in theGroupChatMessagetype.The
replyTofield is integrated into the type definitions, models, resolvers, and there are tests specifically for this field. This confirms that the new field is well-integrated and tested.
src/typeDefs/types.tssrc/models/GroupChatMessage.tssrc/resolvers/GroupChatMessage/replyTo.tstests/resolvers/GroupChatMessage/replyTo.spec.tsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new `replyTo` field in `GroupChatMessage`. # Test: Search for the type usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new field. rg --type graphql -A 5 $'GroupChatMessage'Length of output: 73
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new `replyTo` field in `GroupChatMessage`. # Search for the type definition of GroupChatMessage ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'type GroupChatMessage { $$$ }' # Search for the usage of GroupChatMessage type ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'GroupChatMessage'Length of output: 2592
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new `replyTo` field in `GroupChatMessage`. # Search for the usage of the replyTo field in the files where GroupChatMessage is used rg --type ts 'replyTo' $(rg --type ts --files-with-matches 'GroupChatMessage')Length of output: 3423
src/constants.ts (1)
60-65: LGTM! But verify the usage of the newMESSAGE_NOT_FOUND_ERRORconstant.The addition of the
MESSAGE_NOT_FOUND_ERRORconstant enhances error handling. Ensure that all usages of this constant are correctly implemented.Verification successful
The
MESSAGE_NOT_FOUND_ERRORconstant is correctly utilized in the codebase.The constant is used in both
GroupChatMessageandDirectChatMessageresolvers and their respective test files, indicating proper implementation.
tests/resolvers/GroupChatMessage/replyTo.spec.tstests/resolvers/DirectChatMessage/replyTo.spec.tssrc/resolvers/GroupChatMessage/replyTo.tssrc/resolvers/DirectChatMessage/replyTo.tsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new `MESSAGE_NOT_FOUND_ERROR` constant. # Test: Search for the constant usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new constant. rg --type js -A 5 $'MESSAGE_NOT_FOUND_ERROR'Length of output: 43
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new `MESSAGE_NOT_FOUND_ERROR` constant across all file types. # Test: Search for the constant usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new constant. rg -A 5 $'MESSAGE_NOT_FOUND_ERROR'Length of output: 4429
schema.graphql (1)
1147-1147: LGTM! Ensure proper usage of the newreplyToparameter.The addition of the optional
replyToparameter to thesendMessageToDirectChatmutation is correct and aligns with the PR objectives.However, ensure that the new parameter is correctly utilized in the codebase.
src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts (6)
631-631: LGTM!The addition of the
replyTofield to theDirectChatMessagetype is correct and enhances the schema by enabling message threading.
1016-1016: LGTM!The addition of the
replyTofield to theGroupChatMessagetype is correct and enhances the schema by enabling message threading.
1756-1756: LGTM!The addition of the
replyTofield to theMutationSendMessageToDirectChatArgstype is correct and enhances the mutation arguments by allowing message replies.
1763-1763: LGTM!The addition of the
replyTofield to theMutationSendMessageToGroupChatArgstype is correct and enhances the mutation arguments by allowing message replies.
3959-3959: LGTM!The addition of the
replyToresolver to theDirectChatMessageResolverstype is correct and ensures proper handling of thereplyTofield during query resolution.
4152-4152: LGTM!The addition of the
replyToresolver to theGroupChatMessageResolverstype is correct and ensures proper handling of thereplyTofield during query resolution.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #2420 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 98.40% 98.41%
========================================
Files 357 358 +1
Lines 28478 28458 -20
Branches 2400 2398 -2
========================================
- Hits 28025 28006 -19
+ Misses 450 449 -1
Partials 3 3 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
@disha1202 Please get the code coverage for the patch higher |
|
Please fix the failing tests |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (2)
tests/resolvers/GroupChatMessage/replyTo.spec.ts (1)
28-30: Remove unnecessary check forparentbeing undefined.The
parentobject is derived fromtestGroupChatMessage, which is initialized in thebeforeAllhook. This check is redundant.Remove the check to simplify the test case:
if (!parent) { - throw new Error("Parent object is undefined."); }tests/resolvers/DirectChatMessage/replyTo.spec.ts (1)
29-31: Remove unnecessary check forparentbeing undefined.The
parentobject is derived fromtestDirectChatMessage, which is initialized in thebeforeAllhook. This check is redundant.Remove the check to simplify the test case:
if (!parent) { - throw new Error("Parent object is undefined."); }
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- tests/resolvers/DirectChatMessage/replyTo.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/resolvers/GroupChatMessage/replyTo.spec.ts (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
tests/resolvers/GroupChatMessage/replyTo.spec.ts (2)
39-62: Test case forNotFoundErroris well-implemented.The test case correctly verifies that a
NotFoundErroris thrown when the replyTo message does not exist.
65-81: Test case fornullreturn value is well-implemented.The test case correctly verifies that the resolver returns
nullwhen there is no replyTo message.tests/resolvers/DirectChatMessage/replyTo.spec.ts (2)
45-70: Test case forNotFoundErroris well-implemented.The test case correctly verifies that a
NotFoundErroris thrown when the replyTo message does not exist.
73-90: Test case fornullreturn value is well-implemented.The test case correctly verifies that the resolver returns
nullwhen there is no replyTo message.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- tests/resolvers/DirectChatMessage/replyTo.spec.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- tests/resolvers/DirectChatMessage/replyTo.spec.ts
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- schema.graphql (4 hunks)
- src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts (8 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (8)
schema.graphql (4)
558-558: LGTM!The code changes are approved. Adding the
replyTofield to theDirectChatMessagetype enables threaded conversations in direct chats.
942-942: LGTM!The code changes are approved. Adding the
replyTofield to theGroupChatMessagetype enables threaded conversations in group chats.
1161-1161: LGTM!The code changes are approved. Adding the optional
replyToparameter to thesendMessageToDirectChatmutation allows sending a message as a reply to an existing message in direct chats.
1162-1162: LGTM!The code changes are approved. Adding the optional
replyToparameter to thesendMessageToGroupChatmutation allows sending a message as a reply to an existing message in group chats.src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts (4)
636-636: LGTM!The code change to add an optional
replyTofield to theDirectChatMessagetype is approved. It allows a direct chat message to reference the message it is replying to.
1029-1029: LGTM!The code change to add an optional
replyTofield to theGroupChatMessagetype is approved. It allows a group chat message to reference the message it is replying to.
1763-1763: LGTM!The code change to add an optional
replyToargument to thesendMessageToDirectChatmutation is approved. It allows specifying the ID of the message being replied to when sending a message to a direct chat.
1770-1770: LGTM!The code change to add an optional
replyToargument to thesendMessageToGroupChatmutation is approved. It allows specifying the ID of the message being replied to when sending a message to a group chat.
|
@disha1202 Are you working on this? |
|
This pull request did not get any activity in the past 10 days and will be closed in 180 days if no update occurs. Please verify it has no conflicts with the develop branch and rebase if needed. Mention it now if you need help or give permission to other people to finish your work. |
|
This pull request did not get any activity in the past 10 days and will be closed in 180 days if no update occurs. Please verify it has no conflicts with the develop branch and rebase if needed. Mention it now if you need help or give permission to other people to finish your work. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (10)
tests/helpers/directChat.ts (2)
48-52: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The changes successfully implement the reply functionality for direct chat messages, aligning with the PR objectives. The use of optional chaining is appropriate for handling potential null values.
Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of creating an initial message to reply to, for improved code readability:
+ // Create an initial message to be used as the reply target const directChatMessage = await createDirectChatMessage( testUser?._id, testUser?._id, testDirectChat?._id, );Also applies to: 59-59
Line range hint
101-116: LGTM! Consider using consistent naming for improved clarity.The new
createDirectChatMessagefunction is well-implemented and promotes code reuse for creating direct chat messages. It aligns with the PR objectives and provides a clean way to create messages that can be replied to.For consistency with other helper functions in this file, consider renaming the function to
createTestDirectChatMessage:-export const createDirectChatMessage = async ( +export const createTestDirectChatMessage = async ( senderId: string, receiverId: string, directChatId: string, ): Promise<TestDirectChatMessageType> => { // ... (function body remains the same) };This change would make the function name more consistent with other test helper functions in the file, such as
createTestDirectChatandcreateTestDirectChatMessage.src/typeDefs/mutations.ts (2)
250-250: LGTM! Consider adding a description for thereplyToparameter.The addition of the
replyToparameter aligns well with the PR objective of implementing reply functionality for direct chats. This change allows users to specify which message they are replying to, enhancing the chat experience.Consider adding a description for the
replyToparameter using GraphQL comments. This would improve the schema's self-documentation. For example:sendMessageToDirectChat( chatId: ID! messageContent: String! replyTo: ID # ID of the message being replied to, if any ): DirectChatMessage! @auth
256-256: LGTM! Consider adding a description for thereplyToparameter.The addition of the
replyToparameter aligns well with the PR objective of implementing reply functionality for group chats. This change allows users to specify which message they are replying to, enhancing the chat experience.Consider adding a description for the
replyToparameter using GraphQL comments, similar to the suggestion forsendMessageToDirectChat. This would improve the schema's self-documentation. For example:sendMessageToGroupChat( chatId: ID! messageContent: String! replyTo: ID # ID of the message being replied to, if any ): GroupChatMessage! @authsrc/typeDefs/types.ts (3)
195-195: LGTM! Consider adding a description for thereplyTofield.The addition of the
replyTofield to theDirectChatMessagetype is a good implementation for enabling threaded conversations in direct chats. The field type and optionality are appropriate for this use case.To improve documentation, consider adding a description for the
replyTofield using GraphQL's description syntax. For example:""" The message this message is replying to, if any. """ replyTo: DirectChatMessageThis will provide more context for developers using the GraphQL schema.
391-391: LGTM! Consider adding a description for thereplyTofield.The addition of the
replyTofield to theGroupChatMessagetype is a good implementation, consistent with the change made toDirectChatMessage. This enables threaded conversations in group chats, which is a valuable feature.To improve documentation, consider adding a description for the
replyTofield using GraphQL's description syntax. For example:""" The message this message is replying to, if any. """ replyTo: GroupChatMessageThis will provide more context for developers using the GraphQL schema and maintain consistency with the suggested improvement for
DirectChatMessage.
Line range hint
1-824: Consider additional schema updates for a complete reply implementation.The additions to
DirectChatMessageandGroupChatMessagetypes are good first steps in implementing reply functionality. To ensure a complete and robust implementation, consider the following suggestions:
Update relevant queries and mutations to support the new
replyTofield. For example, you might need to modify the mutation for creating messages to accept areplyToIdparameter.Consider adding new queries specifically for retrieving threaded conversations. This could help in efficiently loading and displaying reply chains.
Ensure that resolvers are updated to handle the new
replyTofield, including any necessary data fetching or permissions checks.If not already present, consider adding a
repliesfield to bothDirectChatMessageandGroupChatMessagetypes. This would allow for easier traversal of reply threads in both directions. For example:type DirectChatMessage { # ... existing fields replyTo: DirectChatMessage replies: [DirectChatMessage!] }Review and update any existing documentation or API guides to reflect the new reply functionality.
Would you like assistance in drafting these additional schema updates or related resolver modifications?
schema.graphql (1)
568-569: Overall implementation looks great, consider adding a resolver commentThe changes implemented for the reply functionality in both DirectChat and GroupChat are well-designed and consistent. They align perfectly with the PR objectives and the AI-generated summary. Here's a summary of the changes:
- Added
replyTofields to both DirectChatMessage and GroupChatMessage types.- Updated
sendMessageToDirectChatandsendMessageToGroupChatmutations to include thereplyToparameter.These changes provide a solid foundation for implementing reply functionality in the GraphQL API.
Consider adding a comment in the schema to guide resolver implementation:
# Add this comment above both sendMessageToDirectChat and sendMessageToGroupChat mutations """ If replyTo is provided, the resolver should verify that the referenced message exists and belongs to the same chat before creating the new message. """This comment will help ensure proper validation is implemented in the resolvers.
Also applies to: 952-953, 1169-1170
src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts (1)
1762-1762: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The addition of the optional
replyToparameter in the sendMessageToDirectChat mutation is well-implemented and corresponds to the new reply functionality.Consider adding a brief comment above this line to explain the purpose of the
replyToparameter, e.g.:# ID of the message being replied to, if any replyTo?: InputMaybe<Scalars['ID']['input']>;This would enhance code readability and self-documentation.
tests/helpers/groupChat.ts (1)
73-80: Rename 'directChatMessage' to 'groupChatMessage' for clarityThe variable
directChatMessageis used to store aGroupChatMessage. This naming might cause confusion, as it suggests a direct chat message instead of a group chat message. Renaming it togroupChatMessageimproves readability and maintains consistency.Apply this diff to rename the variable:
-export const createGroupChatMessage = async ( +export const createGroupChatMessage = async ( senderId: string, groupChatId: string, ): Promise<TestGroupChatMessageType> => { - const directChatMessage = await GroupChatMessage.create({ + const groupChatMessage = await GroupChatMessage.create({ groupChatMessageBelongsTo: groupChatId, sender: senderId, createdAt: new Date(), messageContent: `messageContent${nanoid().toLowerCase()}`, }); - return directChatMessage; + return groupChatMessage; };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
- schema.graphql (3 hunks)
- src/resolvers/Mutation/index.ts (0 hunks)
- src/typeDefs/mutations.ts (1 hunks)
- src/typeDefs/types.ts (2 hunks)
- src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts (5 hunks)
- tests/helpers/directChat.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/helpers/groupChat.ts (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/resolvers/Mutation/index.ts
🔇 Additional comments (10)
tests/helpers/directChat.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-116: Overall, the changes look good and align with the PR objectives.The modifications to
tests/helpers/directChat.tssuccessfully implement the reply functionality for direct chat messages and improve the testing capabilities. The newcreateDirectChatMessagefunction enhances code reusability. The changes are well-implemented and consistent with the existing codebase structure.src/typeDefs/mutations.ts (2)
Line range hint
1-368: Summary of changes and suggestions
- The implementation of reply functionality for both direct and group chats is well-executed and aligns with the PR objectives.
- Consider adding descriptions to the new
replyToparameters in bothsendMessageToDirectChatandsendMessageToGroupChatmutations to improve schema documentation.- The removal of the
removeGroupChatmutation mentioned in the AI-generated summary needs verification, as it's not visible in the provided code changes.Overall, the changes enhance the chat functionality as intended. Please address the suggestions and verify the
removeGroupChatmutation status to complete this review.
Line range hint
1-368: Verify the removal ofremoveGroupChatmutation.The AI-generated summary mentions that the
removeGroupChatmutation has been removed. However, this change is not visible in the provided code. Could you please confirm if this mutation has indeed been removed? If so, please ensure that the removal is reflected in the code changes.To verify this, you can run the following command:
If the mutation has been removed, this command should return no results.
schema.graphql (4)
568-569: LGTM: DirectChatMessage type updated correctlyThe addition of the
replyTofield to the DirectChatMessage type is well-implemented. It allows messages to reference other messages, enabling the reply functionality as intended. The field is correctly set as nullable, accommodating both reply and non-reply messages.
952-953: LGTM: GroupChatMessage type updated correctlyThe addition of the
replyTofield to the GroupChatMessage type is implemented correctly. It enables the reply functionality for group chats by allowing messages to reference other messages. The field is appropriately set as nullable to accommodate both reply and non-reply messages.
1169-1169: LGTM: sendMessageToDirectChat mutation updated correctlyThe
sendMessageToDirectChatmutation has been properly updated to include the optionalreplyToparameter. This change allows clients to specify which message they are replying to when sending a new direct message. The parameter is correctly set as nullable and uses the ID type, which is appropriate for referencing another message.
1170-1170: LGTM: sendMessageToGroupChat mutation updated correctlyThe
sendMessageToGroupChatmutation has been appropriately updated to include the optionalreplyToparameter. This change enables clients to specify which message they are replying to when sending a new message in a group chat. The parameter is correctly set as nullable and uses the ID type, which is suitable for referencing another message.src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts (2)
646-646: LGTM! Great addition of reply functionality.The new
replyTofield in the DirectChatMessage type is a valuable enhancement. It enables threaded conversations in direct chats, which can significantly improve user experience by providing context for replies. This change aligns well with the PR objectives.
1039-1039: LGTM! Excellent consistency in implementing reply functionality.The addition of the
replyTofield to the GroupChatMessage type and the correspondingreplyToparameter in the sendMessageToGroupChat mutation maintains consistency with the DirectChat implementation. This uniform approach to implementing reply functionality across both direct and group chats is commendable.This consistent implementation will make it easier for frontend developers to work with both chat types and provides a cohesive user experience.
Also applies to: 1769-1769
tests/helpers/groupChat.ts (1)
49-52: Verify the impact of the new 'replyTo' field on existing tests and functionalityAdding the
replyTofield may affect existing tests and functionalities that weren't designed with this field in mind. Ensure that all relevant tests are updated, and consider adding new tests to cover cases involvingreplyTo.Run the following script to identify tests that may need updates:
| if (testGroupChat && testUser) { | ||
| const testGroupChatMessage = await GroupChatMessage.create({ | ||
| groupChatMessageBelongsTo: testGroupChat._id, | ||
| sender: testUser._id, | ||
| createdAt: new Date(), | ||
| messageContent: `messageContent${nanoid().toLowerCase()}`, | ||
| replyTo: message?._id, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure 'message' is not null before setting 'replyTo'
Using message?._id implies that message might be null or undefined. If message is null, replyTo will be set to undefined, which may not be the intended behavior. Consider checking if message exists before assigning replyTo.
Apply this diff to check for a valid 'message':
const testGroupChatMessage = await GroupChatMessage.create({
groupChatMessageBelongsTo: testGroupChat._id,
sender: testUser._id,
createdAt: new Date(),
messageContent: `messageContent${nanoid().toLowerCase()}`,
- replyTo: message?._id,
+ replyTo: message ? message._id : undefined,
});📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| replyTo: message?._id, | |
| replyTo: message ? message._id : undefined, |
| const message = await createGroupChatMessage( | ||
| testUser?._id, | ||
| testGroupChat?._id, | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle potential null values for 'testUser' and 'testGroupChat' before using their IDs
The use of optional chaining testUser?._id and testGroupChat?._id suggests that testUser or testGroupChat might be null or undefined. Passing undefined to createGroupChatMessage could lead to unexpected behavior or errors. It's advisable to check if these variables are not null before proceeding.
Apply this diff to handle potential null values:
const [testUser, testOrganization, testGroupChat] =
await createTestGroupChat();
+ if (!testUser || !testGroupChat) {
+ // Handle the error or return appropriately
+ throw new Error('Failed to create test user or group chat');
+ }
const message = await createGroupChatMessage(
testUser._id,
testGroupChat._id,
);Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Issue Number:
Fixes #2416
Did you add tests for your changes?
Yes
Snapshots/Videos:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Summary
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Have you read the contributing guide?
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores
removeGroupChatmutation, indicating a potential change in group chat management processes.