Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support running Input shaper from display #101

Open
phillipthelen opened this issue Feb 12, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

Support running Input shaper from display #101

phillipthelen opened this issue Feb 12, 2024 · 5 comments
Labels
Display Anything regarding the Touch Screen enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@phillipthelen
Copy link
Member

At least on Plus and Max models we can offer input shaper from the display. I still need to look into how exactly the Flow and UX for that is.
Could also try to detect if the normal and pro model have the definitions for input shaper in the printer config to then also offer it there. But that's a bit more involved.

@phillipthelen phillipthelen added enhancement New feature or request Display Anything regarding the Touch Screen labels Feb 12, 2024
@halfmanbear
Copy link
Collaborator

The configs for N4 and Pro still have the references configured for the SPI lines for the input shaper so probably best to run a;

ACCELEROMETER_QUERY

For those models to check if anything is actually connected upon selecting it

@barrenechea
Copy link
Collaborator

I just found some takes on Input Shaper for the Max, hope it helps! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7DWOqmXAABY&t=115s

@phillipthelen
Copy link
Member Author

awesome! That luckily doesn't look too hard

@Justdigit
Copy link

But does the Pro has the build in accelerometer in the print head I mean.

@halfmanbear
Copy link
Collaborator

Only the Max and the Plus i believe

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Display Anything regarding the Touch Screen enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants