ublox Sara U2xx Symbol

[jneiva08]

Added symbol of ublox Sara U2xxx

Datasheet: https://www.u-blox.com/sites/default/files/SARA-U2_DataSheet_(UBX-13005287).pdf
Integration Manual: https://www.u-blox.com/sites/default/files/SARA-G3-U2_SysIntegrManual_%28UBX-13000995%29.pdf

Footprint: #1099

---

Thanks for creating a pull request to contribute to the KiCad libraries! To speed up integration of your PR, please check the following items:

• Provide a URL to a datasheet for the symbol(s) you are contributing
• An example screenshot image is very helpful
• Ensure that the associated footprints match the official footprint library
• If there are matching footprint PRs, provide link(s) as appropriate
• Check the output of the Travis automated check scripts - fix any errors as required

[poeschlr]

I am not sure that power out is the correct electrical type for sim_det

Otherwise this looks good

[jneiva08]

you are right, in the datasheet says input. thanks for catch

[myfreescalewebpage]

Hi @jneiva08, thanks for contributing,

A few comments additionally to @poeschlr :

• Indicate the datasheet in datasheet field, not the integration manual
• According to the datasheet, RESET should be named RESET_N
• According to the datasheet ANT is Bidirectional, not Passive
• You are violating KLC S6.3 (travis output)
• Do you plan to submit footprint "RF_Module:ublox_SARA-G3_LGA-96" ?

Cheers,
Joel

[poeschlr]

@myfreescalewebpage the footprint is found under KiCad/kicad-footprints#1099. And yes this link was missing from this pull request.

[antoniovazquezblanco]

I am sorry another merge caused a conflict in this PR due to KiCad updating the file version.

@myfreescalewebpage about:

According to the datasheet, RESET should be named RESET_N

I think that the _N is to indicate that the logic of the pin is inverted and we can do that with the upper line.

[antoniovazquezblanco]

I resolved the conflict for you @jneiva08

Please make a pull before commiting any other changes!

[myfreescalewebpage]

Hi @antoniovazquezblanco

I think that the _N is to indicate that the logic of the pin is inverted and we can do that with the upper line.

I agree. In the past someone ask me to add _N on a symbol to be consistent with the datasheet. I think he was right because when many pins have a similar name, this is a source of troubles. I think we should keep symbol closed to the datasheet.

[myfreescalewebpage]

@antoniovazquezblanco and @jneiva08 just read KLC S4.7 (http://kicad-pcb.org/libraries/klc/S4.7/) and removed my previous comment about _N. Also make a second review of all the other PR I have commented these days, still some modifications to do to conform with this KLC.

[jneiva08]

@antoniovazquezblanco Thanks for resolved the conflict.
Did find already the problem why didn't open and have already fixed.

[antoniovazquezblanco]

Did find already the problem why didn't open and have already fixed.

Sorry, I resolved the conflict through Github interface and missed those two lines! 🤦‍♂️

[antoniovazquezblanco]

Is there anything missing in this PR?

[myfreescalewebpage]

@antoniovazquezblanco there is question about the ANT pin, also on other PR (#748). Librarians haven't status actually.

@jneiva08 I also just seen you should cross reference and name to be consistent with other devices : reference in top left corner, name in top right corner.

Else, sounds good.

[poeschlr]

Looks good now.

[jneiva08]

thanks for all your time