Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add accelerator detection to Lmod version of EESSI initialisation #781

Merged
merged 35 commits into from
Oct 17, 2024

Conversation

ocaisa
Copy link
Member

@ocaisa ocaisa commented Oct 11, 2024

Copy link

eessi-bot bot commented Oct 11, 2024

Instance eessi-bot-mc-aws is configured to build for:

  • architectures: x86_64/generic, x86_64/intel/haswell, x86_64/intel/skylake_avx512, x86_64/amd/zen2, x86_64/amd/zen3, aarch64/generic, aarch64/neoverse_n1, aarch64/neoverse_v1
  • repositories: eessi.io-2023.06-compat, eessi-hpc.org-2023.06-software, eessi-hpc.org-2023.06-compat, eessi.io-2023.06-software

Copy link

eessi-bot bot commented Oct 11, 2024

Instance eessi-bot-mc-azure is configured to build for:

  • architectures: x86_64/amd/zen4
  • repositories: eessi-hpc.org-2023.06-software, eessi-hpc.org-2023.06-compat, eessi.io-2023.06-software, eessi.io-2023.06-compat

@ocaisa ocaisa marked this pull request as ready for review October 11, 2024 15:44
@ocaisa
Copy link
Member Author

ocaisa commented Oct 15, 2024

@boegel You are probably best placed to review this. I've added a lot of new CI which caught a few problems (in particular unloading the module did not unset a range of environment variables). There is also a check which compares the environment available via the module to that given by the init script.

I've also added a debug mode which can be used to print additional information.

@ocaisa
Copy link
Member Author

ocaisa commented Oct 15, 2024

bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software arch:x86_64/generic

Copy link

eessi-bot bot commented Oct 15, 2024

Updates by the bot instance eessi-bot-mc-aws (click for details)
  • received bot command build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software arch:x86_64/generic from ocaisa

    • expanded format: build repository:eessi.io-2023.06-software architecture:x86_64/generic
  • handling command build repository:eessi.io-2023.06-software architecture:x86_64/generic resulted in:

Updates by the bot instance boegel-bot-deucalion (click for details)
  • account ocaisa has NO permission to send commands to the bot

Copy link

eessi-bot bot commented Oct 15, 2024

Updates by the bot instance eessi-bot-mc-azure (click for details)
  • received bot command build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software arch:x86_64/generic from ocaisa

    • expanded format: build repository:eessi.io-2023.06-software architecture:x86_64/generic
  • handling command build repository:eessi.io-2023.06-software architecture:x86_64/generic resulted in:

    • no jobs were submitted

Copy link

eessi-bot bot commented Oct 15, 2024

New job on instance eessi-bot-mc-aws for CPU micro-architecture x86_64-generic for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software in job dir /project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2024.10/pr_781/23406

date job status comment
Oct 15 20:32:17 UTC 2024 submitted job id 23406 awaits release by job manager
Oct 15 20:32:41 UTC 2024 released job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Oct 15 20:37:56 UTC 2024 running job 23406 is running
Oct 15 20:48:29 UTC 2024 finished
😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details)
Details
✅ job output file slurm-23406.out
✅ no message matching ERROR:
✅ no message matching FAILED:
✅ no message matching required modules missing:
✅ found message(s) matching No missing installations
✅ found message matching .tar.gz created!
Artefacts
eessi-2023.06-software-linux-x86_64-generic-1729024910.tar.gzsize: 0 MiB (2124 bytes)
entries: 1
modules under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/generic/modules/all
no module files in tarball
software under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/generic/software
no software packages in tarball
other under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/generic
2023.06/init/modules/EESSI/2023.06.lua
Oct 15 20:48:29 UTC 2024 test result
😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details)
ReFrame Summary
[ OK ] ( 1/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/29Aug2024-foss-2023b-kokkos /aeb2d9df @BotBuildTests:x86-64-generic-node+default
P: perf: 486.589 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 2/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos /04ff9ece @BotBuildTests:x86-64-generic-node+default
P: perf: 505.861 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 3/10) EESSI_OSU_Micro_Benchmarks_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %scale=1_node %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %device_type=cpu /31ac6ab9 @BotBuildTests:x86-64-generic-node+default
P: latency: 5.21 us (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 4/10) EESSI_OSU_Micro_Benchmarks_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %scale=1_node %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %device_type=cpu /f3be40a2 @BotBuildTests:x86-64-generic-node+default
P: latency: 5.27 us (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 5/10) EESSI_OSU_Micro_Benchmarks_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %scale=1_node %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %device_type=cpu /10e66fba @BotBuildTests:x86-64-generic-node+default
P: latency: 7.91 us (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 6/10) EESSI_OSU_Micro_Benchmarks_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %scale=1_node %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %device_type=cpu /5be57ae7 @BotBuildTests:x86-64-generic-node+default
P: latency: 7.76 us (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 7/10) EESSI_OSU_Micro_Benchmarks_pt2pt %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %scale=1_node %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %device_type=cpu /c8c9aff5 @BotBuildTests:x86-64-generic-node+default
P: latency: 0.71 us (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 8/10) EESSI_OSU_Micro_Benchmarks_pt2pt %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %scale=1_node %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %device_type=cpu /9795e491 @BotBuildTests:x86-64-generic-node+default
P: latency: 0.61 us (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 9/10) EESSI_OSU_Micro_Benchmarks_pt2pt %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %scale=1_node %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %device_type=cpu /48da21c5 @BotBuildTests:x86-64-generic-node+default
P: bandwidth: 10984.0 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] (10/10) EESSI_OSU_Micro_Benchmarks_pt2pt %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %scale=1_node %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %device_type=cpu /1b8c1ca2 @BotBuildTests:x86-64-generic-node+default
P: bandwidth: 11009.13 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ PASSED ] Ran 10/10 test case(s) from 10 check(s) (0 failure(s), 0 skipped, 0 aborted)
Details
✅ job output file slurm-23406.out
✅ no message matching ERROR:
✅ no message matching [\s*FAILED\s*].*Ran .* test case

@ocaisa ocaisa added the ready-to-deploy Mark a PR as ready to deploy label Oct 15, 2024
Updates by the bot instance boegel-bot-deucalion (click for details)
  • account ocaisa has NO permission to send commands to the bot

Copy link

eessi-bot bot commented Oct 16, 2024

Updates by the bot instance eessi-bot-mc-azure (click for details)
  • received bot command build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software arch:x86_64/generic from ocaisa

    • expanded format: build repository:eessi.io-2023.06-software architecture:x86_64/generic
  • handling command build repository:eessi.io-2023.06-software architecture:x86_64/generic resulted in:

    • no jobs were submitted

Copy link

eessi-bot bot commented Oct 16, 2024

New job on instance eessi-bot-mc-aws for CPU micro-architecture x86_64-generic for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software in job dir /project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2024.10/pr_781/23592

date job status comment
Oct 16 11:36:25 UTC 2024 submitted job id 23592 awaits release by job manager
Oct 16 11:37:20 UTC 2024 released job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Oct 16 11:43:22 UTC 2024 running job 23592 is running
Oct 16 11:53:34 UTC 2024 finished
😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details)
Details
✅ job output file slurm-23592.out
✅ no message matching ERROR:
✅ no message matching FAILED:
✅ no message matching required modules missing:
✅ found message(s) matching No missing installations
✅ found message matching .tar.gz created!
Artefacts
eessi-2023.06-software-linux-x86_64-generic-1729079208.tar.gzsize: 0 MiB (2806 bytes)
entries: 1
modules under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/generic/modules/all
no module files in tarball
software under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/generic/software
no software packages in tarball
other under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/generic
2023.06/init/modules/EESSI/2023.06.lua
Oct 16 11:53:34 UTC 2024 test result
😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details)
ReFrame Summary
[ OK ] ( 1/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/29Aug2024-foss-2023b-kokkos /aeb2d9df @BotBuildTests:x86-64-generic-node+default
P: perf: 483.768 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 2/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos /04ff9ece @BotBuildTests:x86-64-generic-node+default
P: perf: 506.811 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 3/10) EESSI_OSU_Micro_Benchmarks_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %scale=1_node %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %device_type=cpu /31ac6ab9 @BotBuildTests:x86-64-generic-node+default
P: latency: 5.3 us (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 4/10) EESSI_OSU_Micro_Benchmarks_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %scale=1_node %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %device_type=cpu /f3be40a2 @BotBuildTests:x86-64-generic-node+default
P: latency: 5.34 us (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 5/10) EESSI_OSU_Micro_Benchmarks_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %scale=1_node %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %device_type=cpu /10e66fba @BotBuildTests:x86-64-generic-node+default
P: latency: 8.09 us (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 6/10) EESSI_OSU_Micro_Benchmarks_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %scale=1_node %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %device_type=cpu /5be57ae7 @BotBuildTests:x86-64-generic-node+default
P: latency: 7.94 us (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 7/10) EESSI_OSU_Micro_Benchmarks_pt2pt %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %scale=1_node %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %device_type=cpu /c8c9aff5 @BotBuildTests:x86-64-generic-node+default
P: latency: 0.71 us (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 8/10) EESSI_OSU_Micro_Benchmarks_pt2pt %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %scale=1_node %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %device_type=cpu /9795e491 @BotBuildTests:x86-64-generic-node+default
P: latency: 0.64 us (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 9/10) EESSI_OSU_Micro_Benchmarks_pt2pt %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %scale=1_node %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %device_type=cpu /48da21c5 @BotBuildTests:x86-64-generic-node+default
P: bandwidth: 10492.35 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] (10/10) EESSI_OSU_Micro_Benchmarks_pt2pt %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %scale=1_node %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %device_type=cpu /1b8c1ca2 @BotBuildTests:x86-64-generic-node+default
P: bandwidth: 10503.85 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ PASSED ] Ran 10/10 test case(s) from 10 check(s) (0 failure(s), 0 skipped, 0 aborted)
Details
✅ job output file slurm-23592.out
✅ no message matching ERROR:
✅ no message matching [\s*FAILED\s*].*Ran .* test case

@ocaisa ocaisa removed the ready-to-deploy Mark a PR as ready to deploy label Oct 16, 2024
@ocaisa
Copy link
Member Author

ocaisa commented Oct 16, 2024

@casparvl @boegel Relevant tests are now passing again here (Lmod does things in the environment that make it hard to do a vanillla comparison).

This should be good to go, retriggered the build for deploy.

@ocaisa ocaisa added the ready-to-deploy Mark a PR as ready to deploy label Oct 16, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@casparvl casparvl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm happy with the code and it works for... 99%. On our system, LMOD_PACKAGE_PATH is set. After loading & unloading the EESSI module, it is unset. So... not exactly the same environment as before :\

I don't know if there is an easy fix. If not, I'm happy to merge this as is - it's definitely a big improvement over what we had.

If we fix it, we should probably also put something like this in the CI tests (i.e. set LMOD_PACKAGE_PATH, load & unload EESSI, and do the env comparison before and after loading/unloading)

@ocaisa
Copy link
Member Author

ocaisa commented Oct 16, 2024

Switched to pushenv for LMOD_PACKAGE_PATH in 04c2573

@ocaisa
Copy link
Member Author

ocaisa commented Oct 16, 2024

I'm reluctant to put LMOD_PACKAGE_PATH into CI as it would need to be a sensible value if you are going to have it set when calling Lmod...and the only sensible one we have in CI is the one we ship with EESSI

@ocaisa
Copy link
Member Author

ocaisa commented Oct 16, 2024

bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software arch:x86_64/generic

Copy link

eessi-bot bot commented Oct 16, 2024

Updates by the bot instance eessi-bot-mc-aws (click for details)
  • received bot command build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software arch:x86_64/generic from ocaisa

    • expanded format: build repository:eessi.io-2023.06-software architecture:x86_64/generic
  • handling command build repository:eessi.io-2023.06-software architecture:x86_64/generic resulted in:

Updates by the bot instance boegel-bot-deucalion (click for details)
  • account ocaisa has NO permission to send commands to the bot

Copy link

eessi-bot bot commented Oct 16, 2024

Updates by the bot instance eessi-bot-mc-azure (click for details)
  • received bot command build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software arch:x86_64/generic from ocaisa

    • expanded format: build repository:eessi.io-2023.06-software architecture:x86_64/generic
  • handling command build repository:eessi.io-2023.06-software architecture:x86_64/generic resulted in:

    • no jobs were submitted

Copy link

eessi-bot bot commented Oct 16, 2024

New job on instance eessi-bot-mc-aws for CPU micro-architecture x86_64-generic for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software in job dir /project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2024.10/pr_781/23603

date job status comment
Oct 16 14:39:26 UTC 2024 submitted job id 23603 awaits release by job manager
Oct 16 14:39:32 UTC 2024 released job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Oct 16 14:40:36 UTC 2024 running job 23603 is running
Oct 16 14:46:46 UTC 2024 finished
😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details)
Details
✅ job output file slurm-23603.out
✅ no message matching ERROR:
✅ no message matching FAILED:
✅ no message matching required modules missing:
✅ found message(s) matching No missing installations
✅ found message matching .tar.gz created!
Artefacts
eessi-2023.06-software-linux-x86_64-generic-1729089618.tar.gzsize: 0 MiB (2842 bytes)
entries: 1
modules under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/generic/modules/all
no module files in tarball
software under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/generic/software
no software packages in tarball
other under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/generic
2023.06/init/modules/EESSI/2023.06.lua
Oct 16 14:46:46 UTC 2024 test result
😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details)
ReFrame Summary
[ OK ] ( 1/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/29Aug2024-foss-2023b-kokkos /aeb2d9df @BotBuildTests:x86-64-generic-node+default
P: perf: 278.829 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 2/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos /04ff9ece @BotBuildTests:x86-64-generic-node+default
P: perf: 479.759 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 3/10) EESSI_OSU_Micro_Benchmarks_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %scale=1_node %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %device_type=cpu /31ac6ab9 @BotBuildTests:x86-64-generic-node+default
P: latency: 5.07 us (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 4/10) EESSI_OSU_Micro_Benchmarks_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %scale=1_node %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %device_type=cpu /f3be40a2 @BotBuildTests:x86-64-generic-node+default
P: latency: 5.27 us (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 5/10) EESSI_OSU_Micro_Benchmarks_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %scale=1_node %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %device_type=cpu /10e66fba @BotBuildTests:x86-64-generic-node+default
P: latency: 7.79 us (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 6/10) EESSI_OSU_Micro_Benchmarks_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %scale=1_node %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %device_type=cpu /5be57ae7 @BotBuildTests:x86-64-generic-node+default
P: latency: 8.06 us (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 7/10) EESSI_OSU_Micro_Benchmarks_pt2pt %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %scale=1_node %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %device_type=cpu /c8c9aff5 @BotBuildTests:x86-64-generic-node+default
P: latency: 0.7 us (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 8/10) EESSI_OSU_Micro_Benchmarks_pt2pt %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %scale=1_node %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %device_type=cpu /9795e491 @BotBuildTests:x86-64-generic-node+default
P: latency: 0.88 us (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 9/10) EESSI_OSU_Micro_Benchmarks_pt2pt %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %scale=1_node %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %device_type=cpu /48da21c5 @BotBuildTests:x86-64-generic-node+default
P: bandwidth: 11200.63 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] (10/10) EESSI_OSU_Micro_Benchmarks_pt2pt %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %scale=1_node %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %device_type=cpu /1b8c1ca2 @BotBuildTests:x86-64-generic-node+default
P: bandwidth: 11228.71 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ PASSED ] Ran 10/10 test case(s) from 10 check(s) (0 failure(s), 0 skipped, 0 aborted)
Details
✅ job output file slurm-23603.out
✅ no message matching ERROR:
✅ no message matching [\s*FAILED\s*].*Ran .* test case
Oct 16 19:53:12 UTC 2024 uploaded transfer of eessi-2023.06-software-linux-x86_64-generic-1729089618.tar.gz to S3 bucket succeeded

@casparvl
Copy link
Collaborator

casparvl commented Oct 16, 2024

I'm reluctant to put LMOD_PACKAGE_PATH into CI as it would need to be a sensible value if you are going to have it set when calling Lmod...and the only sensible one we have in CI is the one we ship with EESSI

Couldn't you copy (or symlink) that file to a new location, then point LMOD_PACKAGE_PATH there? I mean, it's no dealbreaker for me, I'm also fine without testing it - it is a bit tricky I admit since it affects stuff as well.

@ocaisa
Copy link
Member Author

ocaisa commented Oct 16, 2024

I'm not against it really but it feels like a potential CI rabbit hole since it does affect Lmod behaviour. If someone is keen enough, that could be done in a follow-up PR.

@boegel boegel added pilot-2023.04 2023.06-software.eessi.io 2023.06 version of software.eessi.io labels Oct 16, 2024
@casparvl
Copy link
Collaborator

Tried again. these were the only differences:

$ diff pre_env post_env
7c7
< _ModuleTable002_=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
---
> _ModuleTable002_=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
46a47
> __LMOD_STACK_LMOD_PACKAGE_PATH=L3N3L25vYXJjaC9MTW9kSG9va3M=

Not sure what exactly this _LMOD_STACK thing is, but I'm ok with it.

@casparvl casparvl added bot:deploy Ask bot to deploy missing software installations to EESSI and removed ready-to-deploy Mark a PR as ready to deploy labels Oct 16, 2024

Label bot:deploy has been set by user casparvl, but this person does not have permission to trigger deployments

@boegel boegel merged commit 901a944 into EESSI:2023.06-software.eessi.io Oct 17, 2024
50 checks passed
Copy link

eessi-bot bot commented Oct 17, 2024

PR merged! Moved ['/project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2024.10/pr_781/23406', '/project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2024.10/pr_781/23584', '/project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2024.10/pr_781/23587', '/project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2024.10/pr_781/23592', '/project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2024.10/pr_781/23603'] to /project/def-users/SHARED/trash_bin/EESSI/software-layer/2024.10.17

PR merged! Moved [] to /home/kehoste/project_dir/bot/trash-bin #$HOME/trash_bin/EESSI/software-layer/2024.10.17

Copy link

eessi-bot bot commented Oct 17, 2024

PR merged! Moved [] to /project/def-users/SHARED/trash_bin/EESSI/software-layer/2024.10.17

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
2023.06-software.eessi.io 2023.06 version of software.eessi.io bot:deploy Ask bot to deploy missing software installations to EESSI
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants