Introducing autosym2
#517
Merged
Introducing autosym2
#517
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR introduces and alternative version of the
autosymcapability. All models with theautosymoption can now be compiled withautosym2option, which introducesSymmetryEdgeboundary conditions, which are symmetry boundary conditions, but not on the middle of element, but on the edge of the element. This allows for using symmetry in common cases with even number of elements. Eg. for a simulation of a droplet, withautosymwe need 99x99 cross-section, and the center of the droplet at 49.5, with the reduced domain to 50x50 with symmetry, and withautosym2one can use a channel of 100x100 and the particle can be centrally between elements at 50.