Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

SEPARATE_CONFIDENCE and explicit weighting #22

Open
yuanming-hu opened this issue Jul 20, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

SEPARATE_CONFIDENCE and explicit weighting #22

yuanming-hu opened this issue Jul 20, 2018 · 1 comment
Assignees
@yuanming-hu

Comments

@yuanming-hu
Copy link
Owner

yuanming-hu commented Jul 20, 2018 •
edited
Loading

It is reported by some user that when this option is set to True (explicit confidence weighting, the mean error goes to ~4 (in contrast to 1.63 when it is set to False, where implicit confidence weighting is used). This is not a reasonable behavior and worth figuring out what's wrong with the current code.
@yuanming-hu yuanming-hu self-assigned this Jul 20, 2018
@yuanming-hu yuanming-hu changed the title SEPARATE_CONFIDENCE case error ridiculously high SEPARATE_CONFIDENCE and explicit weighting Mar 13, 2019
@amandayeyan
Copy link

Have you figured out the correct hyperparameters for SEPARATE_CONFIDENCE=True?
I also tried SEPARATE_CONFIDENCE True, but the performance cannot beat it is set False.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@yuanming-hu yuanming-hu

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@yuanming-hu @amandayeyan