Missing logic integration of node status

[sque]

Code was added that you could declare the node status, like active, inactive, pending, or deleted. I personally find it a very reasonable addition, but there is no logic integration with the rest of the application. How exactly this status influence the flow of the application? Which nodes should be visible in the map? If I disable a node, what will happen with the links? Right now if I change the status, it only affects the node view page, there is no other effect than this.

So what was the plan behind this change? And how will be implemented. WiND 1 has very obscure way to define this kind of logic and it is not inside the "models" of the system, but rather on the "views".

[ysamouhos]

Before it was active,inactive and deleted if I recall correctly.

Pending status added in nodes together with Due Date and Pending in links page.
It s just for people to communicate their intentions and not just write to forums about it.

You are right, there is no application flow in this but there is no flow in v1 as a whole or just limited to the very best.

I am not sure that issue tracker is the place for such discussions but if you insist, it is fine by be.

[ysamouhos]

Btw just noticed that new template hasn't got the correct input method for due date in links page.

This needs fix. Old template was ok.

[sque]

Issue tracker is more or less a mailing list with tracked subjects. I don't mind if you propose a different place to discuss this matters, but till then this is the most appropriate tool.

What exactly means the due date? The estimation date that the user will deploy this node? And the pending? That the user is on the "construction" phase?