Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Extra relation in text #301

Open
riannella opened this issue Mar 16, 2018 · 4 comments
Open

Extra relation in text #301

riannella opened this issue Mar 16, 2018 · 4 comments
Assignees
@riannella
Labels
Editorial Errata Model

Comments

@riannella
Copy link
Contributor

Remove the extra "relation" from:

Explicit sub-properties of the abstract relation, relation and failure properties must be used, the choice depending on the subclass of Rule in question.
@riannella riannella self-assigned this Mar 16, 2018
@simonstey
Copy link
Contributor

Remove Replace the extra "relation" with "function"

@riannella
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is a clear typo in the text and should be accepted as an Errata

@riannella
Copy link
Contributor Author

Summary: In Section "2.6 Role Class", 4th para, the second "relation" should be replaced with "function"

@riannella riannella reopened this Feb 3, 2021
bact added a commit to bact/poe that referenced this issue Jan 10, 2024
@bact
Fix typos in ODRL Information Model
fa1c664 
Per erratum summary of w3c#295 and w3c#301
@bact bact mentioned this issue Jan 10, 2024
Merged
@bact
Copy link
Contributor

bact commented Jan 10, 2024

Fixed and already live on https://w3c.github.io/poe/model/

This was referenced Aug 9, 2024
Closed
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@riannella riannella

Labels
Editorial Errata Model
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@bact @simonstey @riannella