Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[question] Why uTLS was removed #2034

Closed
kotori2 opened this issue Oct 5, 2022 · 7 comments
Closed

[question] Why uTLS was removed #2034

kotori2 opened this issue Oct 5, 2022 · 7 comments
Labels

Comments

@kotori2
Copy link

kotori2 commented Oct 5, 2022

There were discussions about TLS fingerprint back to Dec 2019, they came up with a solution using uTLS.

But soon after v2fly detached from v2ray main stream, @RPRX submitted a commit deleting uTLS support. I'm wondering the reason why the community stopped support for mocking TLS fingerprint.

9311cb1 #60

@kotori2
Copy link
Author

kotori2 commented Oct 5, 2022

Also some discussions at #557

@chika0801
Copy link

问原因没意义了,过去了的事情。@RPRX 的TG账号已经超过1年没登录。

@sorz
Copy link

sorz commented Oct 6, 2022

Times changed, we should re-evaluation the value of incorporating uTLS.

@SekiBetu
Copy link

SekiBetu commented Oct 6, 2022

浏览器转发比uTLS更加好一点吧,uTLS早晚也要被攻破的

@ZhuangJiayu
Copy link

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This issue is stale because it has been open 120 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 5 days

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Feb 15, 2023
@RPRX
Copy link
Contributor

RPRX commented Feb 15, 2023

与你们猜测的原因均无关,其实只需往上看上一个 commit / PR 就能得到答案:e465312 #59

当时我给 v2ray 加了 Linux RISC-V 64 的编译,但 uTLS 这个依赖项存在问题,由于它并没有被实际用到,所以为了使编译通过,它被暂时移除了(相关代码被注释,而不是删除,以便日后加回来),并且我向 uTLS 提了 issue:refraction-networking/utls#49

仅此而已,这一行为不包含任何“我们是否应当使用 uTLS”的价值取向或价值导向。

@RPRX RPRX closed this as completed Feb 15, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants