MARC-to-RDF transform: fields that likely will require updating the code (because only 1 or two subfield values were processed in the MARC where many subfields exist)

[gerontakos]

• MARC 075
  • Potential problem: only $0 and $1 values were output to RDF/XML. It's possible, someday, we'll want to output additional subfield values.
• MARC 155
  • Potential problem: only $a value was output to RDF/XML. That's because, at this time, the only subfield that appears in the NGL MARC is $a. If other subfields are used eventually, new conditions will be required in the transform.
• MARC 455
  • Potential problem: only $a value was output to RDF/XML. That's because, at this time, the only subfield that appears in the NGL MARC is $a. If other subfields are used eventually, new conditions will be required in the transform.
• MARC 680
  • Potential problem: only $i value was output to RDF/XML. That's because, at this time, the only subfield that appears in the NGL MARC is $i. If other subfields are used eventually, new conditions will be required in the transform.
• MARC 750
  • Potential problem: only $0 values were output to RDF/XML. It's possible, someday, we'll want to output additional subfield values.
• MARC 755
  • Potential problem: only $1 values were output to RDF/XML. It's possible, someday, we'll want to output additional subfield values.

[gerontakos]

Potential problems noted when preparing version 1-1-1. Nothing done about this at present; maybe later, when it becomes an actual problem.