Comment Metadata

[0x4007]

The bot needs to begin relying on standardized comment metadata to understand the intent behind its comments across all comments it leaves.

Let's collaboratively figure out a standardized schema. To start, I'm combining some details that could be useful:

{
  "payments": [
    {
      // https://github.com/ubiquity/ubiquibot/issues/752
      "rewards": {
        "issueIssuer": 50, // Not sure if we should use BigNumber in the context of GitHub rewards, but it seems sensible to stick with a single number format; referring to the permit amounts at the bottom of this object. 
        "issueAssignee": 0,
        "issueCollaborator": 15,
        "issueDefault": 0,
        "reviewIssuer": 0,
        "reviewAssignee": 0,
        "reviewCollaborator": 35,
        "reviewDefault": 0
      },
      // Combined GitHub & DevPool user details 
      "user": {
        // GitHub user API details
        "github": {
          "login": "pavlovcik",
          "id": 4975670,
          "node_id": "MDQ6VXNlcjQ5NzU2NzA="
        },
        // User query details
        "devpool": {
          "wallet": "0x4007CE2083c7F3E18097aeB3A39bb8eC149a341d",
          "debt": 0,
          "multiplier": 1,
          "multiplier_reason": null,
          "xp_repo": 100,
          "xp_org": 125,
          "xp_global": 150
        }
      },
      // Taken from a generated permit in pay.ubq.fi
      "permit": {
        "permitted": {
          "token": "0xe91D153E0b41518A2Ce8Dd3D7944Fa863463a97d",
          "amount": "100000000000000000000"
        },
        "nonce": "13542947074111652719901668005035019681223431334697979444189644619207253239819",
        "deadline": "115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640564039457584007913129639935"
      },
      "transferDetails": {
        "to": "0x4007CE2083c7F3E18097aeB3A39bb8eC149a341d",
        "requestedAmount": "100000000000000000000"
      },
      "owner": "0xf87ca4583C792212e52720d127E7E0A38B818aD1",
      "signature": "0xf1967e05c37895f9bcd258bd830027994016d0666d6413f2d5ed7dc4aa26d2ae5d72f0fdc4d8a3c4d3569039c2c5cb705b4f0a3fe50fd00263641ad524005e141b"
    }
  ]
}

It seems penalties were implemented back when there was only the assignee reward and no creator/conversation rewards so it just looks for a first claim URL. We should fix this and try to switch to comment metadata as soon as possible

Originally posted by @whilefoo in #768 (comment)