Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is there a way to take our tune_results object and coerce it into the right format to use here? #71

Open
edgararuiz opened this issue Jan 4, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@edgararuiz
Copy link
Collaborator

    Is there a way to take our `tune_results` object and coerce it into the right format to use here? 

In the tune_results structure, the data object in the elements of splits are the training data and these new validate functions requires the predictors to be there.

We should talk about this in the Details section (that they are not the same) and maybe have a helper function to convert the original results to something that cal_validate_ * can consume.

I don't see a simple way to keep the same resampling structure as the original tune_results object.

Originally posted by @topepo in #63 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant