We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pulling from Courtney's comment
Courtney: "From our usability test last Friday with a BLM natural resource specialist on the beta app, first and second locations she selected:
soils have location percentages other than 100%
Some soils get 100% match
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
At 44.04219, -107.7188 I don't have a 100% match of soils
44.04219, -107.7188
44.16471, -107.33253
Sorry, something went wrong.
@CourtneyLee333 are there other locations where you're getting a 100% match?
@DerekCaelin on v1.0.2 (190) beta I no longer get 100% match on the original example coords or several other locations I tried.
OK! Closing this issue for now. I will continue to look out for instances of 100% matches
On iOS, I created a site at 41.7063, -72.63145. In the temporary site I got 80% for Pootatuck. Upon becoming a permanent site, it becomes 100%.
41.7063, -72.63145
jjmaynard
No branches or pull requests
Pulling from Courtney's comment
Courtney: "From our usability test last Friday with a BLM natural resource specialist on the beta app, first and second locations she selected:
Steps to reproduce
Expected behavior
soils have location percentages other than 100%
Actual behavior
Some soils get 100% match
Additional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: