You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In discussion with @mcginkel it is clear that for progress and results to be exchanged, the LMS and LA need to agree a basic level of structure about the product itself to enable this exchange to happen.
Atomic: It needs to support the simplest model - e.g. the LA is a single activity (e.g. it starts, finishes, and has a result that is passed back) - like a typical LTI exchange.
MultiStep: It needs to support more complex models - e.g. the LA provides a set of activities or assignments that the learner can progress through over time, so progress and results should be exchanged about the activities.
In discussion with @mcginkel it is clear that for progress and results to be exchanged, the LMS and LA need to agree a basic level of structure about the product itself to enable this exchange to happen.
The basic catalogue is defined: https://stichtingsem.stoplight.io/docs/sem-technology-prototype/branches/learning-application-catalogue/reference/catalogue.v1.yaml for commercial usage (e.g. so a school can see, select, purchase).
The LMS requires more detail, thoughts:
Related: #17 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: