Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Should the SPDX listed license IRI refer to the general SPDX license or should it be specific to the SPDX 3 version of the license data? #886

Open
goneall opened this issue Sep 24, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Should the SPDX listed license IRI refer to the general SPDX license or should it be specific to the SPDX 3 version of the license data? #886

goneall opened this issue Sep 24, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
model Something about the abstract model

Comments

@goneall
Copy link
Member

goneall commented Sep 24, 2024

From the discussion on the tech call on 24 Sept. 2024:

Currently we are using the same IRI for both the 2.3 and 3.0 versions of the spec. Is this appropriate since the formats, fields and classes are different?

If not, what should the IRI be?
@bact bact added the model Something about the abstract model label Sep 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
model Something about the abstract model
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@bact @goneall