Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Decommission operation timeout is too small for DB cluster with enabled tablets feature #8855

Open
vponomaryov opened this issue Sep 26, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@vponomaryov
Copy link
Contributor

vponomaryov commented Sep 26, 2024

Issue description

Nemesis disrupt_decommission_streaming_err times out in the test with enabled tablets:

2024-09-21 07:32:46.414: (ClusterHealthValidatorEvent Severity.CRITICAL) period_type=one-time \
    event_id=2d16b283-0ee6-4651-9862-d60efd70c2d3: type=NodeStatus \
    node=longevity-large-partitions-200k-pks-db-node-b866c292-0-2 \
    error=Current node Node longevity-large-partitions-200k-pks-db-node-b866c292-0-2 [34.148.211.120 | 10.142.0.128]. \
    Node Node longevity-large-partitions-200k-pks-db-node-b866c292-0-5 [35.185.64.144 | 10.142.0.139] \
    (DecommissionStreamingErr nemesis target node) status is UL

Argus:
Screenshot from 2024-09-26 22-22-11

Looking at the cluster state everything was going ok all that time while timeout was not reached.

So, I increased the timeout for it and ran another test here: scylla-staging/valerii/vp-longevity-large-partition-200k-pks-4days-gce-test#4

After timeout increase the nemesis passed:
Screenshot from 2024-09-26 22-23-17

Note that in the passed variant the add node operation after decommission was started at 11:39.
So, decommission under heavy write load took about 2h15m whereas current timeout is 1h20m.

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Setup a DB cluster with tablets
  2. Run heavy write load with large partitions
  3. Run disrupt_decommission_streaming_err nemesis

Expected behavior: SCT waits proper amount of time

Actual behavior: SCT raises timeout error too early

Impact

False negative

How frequently does it reproduce?

100%

Installation details

SCT Version: master
Scylla version (or git commit hash): master/6.3

Logs

@fruch
Copy link
Contributor

fruch commented Sep 29, 2024

@aleksbykov

isn't that something you already identified ? during this case ? has been any work related to fixed that ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants