-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 156
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Ruby 3.2 #499
Add Ruby 3.2 #499
Conversation
We have agreed on the internal meeting, that ruby-3.2 container will not be part of sclorg/s2i-ruby-container. We will skip it and later on add ruby-3.3. @jackorp Am I right? |
Yep, no Ruby 3.2 for sclorg/s2i-ruby-container. For Fedora IIRC the comment was that if the community really wants it, we can merge, build and it's on a self-support basis. As in, you find a bug, you fix it yourself. |
This is just for testing purposes... can I push it to |
Related issue: #461. |
Will it bring you any benefits to move this from your fork to non-main sclorg branch? |
Just for transparency. In case someone wants to experiment with it as well. |
I just want to check that everything still works with |
Btw. there's like 20 other random branches, so it probably doesn't matter... |
That is true, but they are kind of polluting the repository and it would be difficult to get rid of them and make sure not to delete someone's work-in-progress. I would therefore suggest primarily using forks in the future. |
Thanks for the comments! |
And here's the built image, in case someone's interested: |
In Fedora container:
Build log: https://gist.github.com/pvalena/4caf0873c714acc8e2b14dc6d88de315