New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

License #61

Open

olafveerman opened this issue Jan 31, 2017 · 1 comment

Collaborator

olafveerman commented Jan 31, 2017

Add in license for content + code.
Should we do CC BY 4.0 for the content and MIT for code?

@brunosan @ianschuler

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

Member

brunosan commented Jan 31, 2017 via email

Yes. As per agreed on discussions and license from WB work upstream.

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017, 12:50 PM Olaf Veerman ***@***.***> wrote: Add in license for content + code. Should we do CC BY 4.0 for the content and MIT for code? @brunosan <https://github.com/brunosan> @ianschuler <https://github.com/ianschuler> — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#61>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAafbe4WmDzIr5CwRKCi_-JyghU0oMnEks5rX3RkgaJpZM4Ly89Z> .

-- Bruno

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment