https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4918 instead of https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2518

[maulik-modi]

Implement https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4918 instead of RFC2518

[ramondeklein]

Wish I knew of that one before, so I could have implemented it directly. Could you explain why you need RFC4918, so I can prioritize? I haven't had much time lately to work on NWebDAV and probably won't in the next few months. A PR would be very welcome.

[maulik-modi]

It is just that RFS2518 is obsolete. For new comers, RFC4918 should be the way to go.

[hnnweb]

it would be great with RFC4918 support as we are trying to implement WebDav for Word support using the Office URI scheme:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/office/client-developer/office-uri-schemes?redirectedfrom=MSDN.