You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@abhisheksparikh I think we'd be happy to have #167 if it's ready in time, but also no big deal to push it to the next release if you don't have bandwidth available right now.
If anyone has additional items they'd like to get into 0.1.3 (thermopile offsets?), feel free to add them to the milestone and solicit reviews.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@kanderso-nrel I just went over #146 again and saw it's only doing an example for the pvwatts orientation method, which I'm currently more comfortable with than the infer_orientation_daily_peak() method (Matt's original implementation is yielding different results from the pvanalytics implementation, which is less accurate). I'm okay with picking this back up here today and getting it squared away for the next version release. I'll need to eventually retool infer_orientation_daily_peak() to get it more accurate/faster.
Shall we aim for a release next week? It's been ~3 months since 0.1.2 and we've got some nice things waiting to go out (whatsnew).
@kperrynrel what are your thoughts on #146?
@abhisheksparikh I think we'd be happy to have #167 if it's ready in time, but also no big deal to push it to the next release if you don't have bandwidth available right now.
If anyone has additional items they'd like to get into 0.1.3 (thermopile offsets?), feel free to add them to the milestone and solicit reviews.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: