Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

v0.1.3 planning #175

Closed
kandersolar opened this issue Dec 9, 2022 · 2 comments · Fixed by #177
Closed

v0.1.3 planning #175

kandersolar opened this issue Dec 9, 2022 · 2 comments · Fixed by #177
Milestone

Comments

@kandersolar
Copy link
Member

Shall we aim for a release next week? It's been ~3 months since 0.1.2 and we've got some nice things waiting to go out (whatsnew).

@kperrynrel what are your thoughts on #146?

@abhisheksparikh I think we'd be happy to have #167 if it's ready in time, but also no big deal to push it to the next release if you don't have bandwidth available right now.

If anyone has additional items they'd like to get into 0.1.3 (thermopile offsets?), feel free to add them to the milestone and solicit reviews.

@kandersolar kandersolar added this to the v0.1.3 milestone Dec 9, 2022
@abhisheksparikh
Copy link

Yes, I want to complete the GHI and POA quality checks in #167. I will get the GHI check in by 12/11.

@kperrynrel
Copy link
Member

@kanderso-nrel I just went over #146 again and saw it's only doing an example for the pvwatts orientation method, which I'm currently more comfortable with than the infer_orientation_daily_peak() method (Matt's original implementation is yielding different results from the pvanalytics implementation, which is less accurate). I'm okay with picking this back up here today and getting it squared away for the next version release. I'll need to eventually retool infer_orientation_daily_peak() to get it more accurate/faster.

@kandersolar kandersolar mentioned this issue Dec 15, 2022
4 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants