You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm interested in replacing the use of reqwest with ehttp.
The advantage is a lot less dependencies. reqwest brings in a huge tree of dependencies, including tokio, while ehttp depends only on the minimal ureq. This in turn translates to faster compile times and smaller binaries.
Would you be open to a PR making such a change?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sounds interesting, but last time when I was choosing between two, ehttp didn't support multiple downloads, not sure if that changed? Also, walkers do HTTP cache though http-cache. But if these are addressed, I see no reason not to accept it.
A possible avenue might be to split the tile download/cache part from the rendering part, and make the former optionally swappable by a custom implementation.
Hello, and thanks for an awesome crate!
I'm interested in replacing the use of
reqwest
withehttp
.The advantage is a lot less dependencies.
reqwest
brings in a huge tree of dependencies, includingtokio
, whileehttp
depends only on the minimalureq
. This in turn translates to faster compile times and smaller binaries.Would you be open to a PR making such a change?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: