Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"checklist of ciliates (Ciliophora) inhabiting on ostracods (Crustacea, Ostracoda)" has bad dwca data #257

Open
mdoering opened this issue Aug 21, 2023 · 6 comments
Assignees

Comments

@mdoering
Copy link

See CatalogueOfLife/checklistbank#1260
For example see verbatim data for Loxophyllum helus:

dwc:scientificName: Loxophyllum helus (Stokes 1884) (Stokes, 1884) Penard 1922
dwc:scientificNameAuthorship: (Stokes 1884) (Stokes, 1884) Penard 1922
@mdoering
Copy link
Author

also the classification and more odd authorships

@truschel
Copy link

Dear all
I was working on the two papers mentioned here CatalogueOfLife/checklistbank#1260

Here are the links for both on TB:

  1. https://treatment.plazi.org/GgServer/summary/5658A410FFBA032BFFD4FFDFFA7DFF86
    and the treatment mentioned https://treatment.plazi.org/id/AA61DC68FFB50324FF43FCC0FE33FAFE

  2. https://treatment.plazi.org/GgServer/summary/FF9750679F768866350DB059FFA4BA37
    and the treatment mentioned https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AE281F9F718861359AB557FC96BFCC

The first one presented taxonomicNames with incorrect attributes for authorityName. The baseAuthorityName attribute was missing and the authorityName attribute had two author names. So I fixed it, as well the kingdom for all taxonomic names in the paper, as pointed by @kbseah.

Before I fix:

image

Later:
image

However, the species name in checklistbank is the same:
https://www.checklistbank.org/dataset/46512/taxon/AA61DC68FFB50324FF43FCC0FE33FAFE.taxon

The second paper present correct taxonomicName attributes:
image
And here how it is in checklistbank:
https://www.checklistbank.org/dataset/23066/taxon/03AE281F9F718861359AB557FC96BFCC.taxon

Maybe an import error? gsautter @myrmoteras any idea how we can deal with this problem?

Cheers

@myrmoteras
Copy link
Contributor

myrmoteras commented Aug 23, 2023 via email

@mdoering
Copy link
Author

Is this a very recent change? CLB is in read only mode since Monday and no imports are running all week

@myrmoteras
Copy link
Contributor

@truschel when did you make the changes?

@truschel
Copy link

truschel commented Aug 24, 2023

@myrmoteras I did yesterday. So, maybe in the next week the correct name will be in CLB?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants