Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: docs typo #808

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 23, 2024
Merged

fix: docs typo #808

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 23, 2024

Conversation

MaxFrank13
Copy link
Member

There is a typo in the architecture doc for the template application. While this doc is still in the "proposed" state, it has been around for about 5 years and has been copied over into most of our MFEs. Whether or not it is actually accepted is another topic for a large group of people, but I figure fixing typos can't hurt.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 23, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 0.00%. Comparing base (3a2ff39) to head (3830c35).

Additional details and impacted files
@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #808   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage    0.00%   0.00%           
======================================
  Files           2       2           
  Lines           7       7           
======================================
  Misses          7       7           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@adamstankiewicz adamstankiewicz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems reasonable to me! Nice catch on the typos.

@MaxFrank13 MaxFrank13 merged commit 8092659 into master Jul 23, 2024
6 checks passed
@MaxFrank13 MaxFrank13 deleted the mfrank/docs-typo branch July 23, 2024 15:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants