You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm the main author and maintainer of the sphinxcontrib-matlabdomain Python package.
I just finished a major update of the extension and added a new configuration option: matlab_short_links. In short (no pun intended), it's finally possible to render and link to MATLAB classes and function by the name they have in MATLAB.
Instead of src.package.AmazingClass, you now get package.AmazingClass. Further, the linking to that is :class:`package.AmazingClass`.
As you are a major user of the extension, I would appreciate if you could take the time to test if the new release works as expected. In your requirements.txt, please specify:
sphinxcontrib-matlabdomain==0.19.0rc1
If you need any help or discover issues please reach out to me in this thread.
Thanks!
I hereby confirm that I have:
Tried to solve the issue on my own
Retried to run my code with the latest version of The COBRA Toolbox
Checked that a similar issue has not already been opened
(Note: You may replace [ ] with [X] to check the box)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
sphinxcontrib-matlabdomain 0.19.0 pre-release
Hi
I'm the main author and maintainer of the
sphinxcontrib-matlabdomain
Python package.I just finished a major update of the extension and added a new configuration option:
matlab_short_links
. In short (no pun intended), it's finally possible to render and link to MATLAB classes and function by the name they have in MATLAB.Instead of
src.package.AmazingClass
, you now getpackage.AmazingClass
. Further, the linking to that is:class:`package.AmazingClass`
.As you are a major user of the extension, I would appreciate if you could take the time to test if the new release works as expected. In your
requirements.txt
, please specify:If you need any help or discover issues please reach out to me in this thread.
Thanks!
I hereby confirm that I have:
(Note: You may replace [ ] with [X] to check the box)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: