Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[async] Separate stdexec to a separate recipe #85

Open
vsytch opened this issue Oct 23, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

[async] Separate stdexec to a separate recipe #85

vsytch opened this issue Oct 23, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@vsytch
Copy link
Contributor

vsytch commented Oct 23, 2023

I'm trying to use https://github.com/maikel/senders-io to incorporporate io-uring support, but it requires a patched version of stdexec. The local copy of stdexec in sdbusplus has a different directory layout than the upstream version, which makes it impossible to cherry-pick a patch.

Is there a plan to remove the local copy of stdexec and move to a bitbake recipe instead?

@williamspatrick
Copy link
Member

I'd be ok to do that if someone wants to write a bitbake recipe and contribute code here and/or stdexec so that it can be picked up as a meson subproject. Right now stdexec is using conan + cmake, which is a pain to integrate into meson.

I'm expecting that most of stdexec will become part of std in C++26. There are also some header files that we are using out of stdexec that they haven't matured enough to be a proposal in C++26 yet, but are really useful. I don't think they currently even 'install' these because they haven't considered the API stable yet.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants