Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

gtfs:zone is an object property in the ontology but data property in the mappings #135

Open
huanyu-li opened this issue Aug 25, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@huanyu-li
Copy link

huanyu-li commented Aug 25, 2022

Hi David,

I just have a question about the mappings. From what I see in this mapping file (https://github.com/oeg-upm/gtfs-bench/blob/master/mappings/gtfs-rdb.r2rml.ttl), gtfs:zone seems to be a data property. However in the gtfs terms (https://github.com/OpenTransport/linked-gtfs/blob/master/gtfs.ttl), it is an object property.

So I just want to know if you have the latest ontology or gtfs terms that you used to define the mappings.

Thank you in advance.

Best,
Huanyu Li

@dachafra
Copy link
Member

Hi @huanyu-li,
You are right, we will update the mappings asap to generate a URI for the gtfs:zone. In any case, I think there are no values for that column (zone_id) on the original data, so you will never generate any RDF term/triple ;-)

@dachafra dachafra added enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested labels Aug 25, 2022
@dachafra dachafra changed the title Regarding gtfs terms gtfs:zone is an object property in the ontology but data property in the mappings Aug 25, 2022
@huanyu-li
Copy link
Author

OK, I see. Thanks for the reply.

@dachafra dachafra removed the question Further information is requested label Aug 30, 2022
@dachafra dachafra added this to the v1.3 milestone Oct 18, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants