Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

RFC: nibabel.four_to_three considered harmful? #632

Open
effigies opened this issue Apr 22, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

RFC: nibabel.four_to_three considered harmful? #632

effigies opened this issue Apr 22, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@effigies
Copy link
Member

Follow-up to #628, I think the concat_images(four_to_three()) idiom is clear and concise, but not memory efficient in many cases. We may want to come up with another idiom to do this fairly common operation that can be lazier and minimize copies.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@effigies