Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do confound regression before rapidtide? #13

Open
tsalo opened this issue Sep 4, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Do confound regression before rapidtide? #13

tsalo opened this issue Sep 4, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@tsalo
Copy link
Collaborator

tsalo commented Sep 4, 2024

What would you like to see added in fMRIPost-Rapidtide?

Would it make sense to do the confound regression before running rapidtide? It seems like it happens pretty early in the workflow, and that step overwrites the fmri_data_valid array, so it might be worth doing.

Do you have any interest in helping implement the feature?

Yes

Additional information / screenshots

No response

@tsalo tsalo added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 4, 2024
@bbfrederick
Copy link
Collaborator

Do you mean outside of the rapidtide program? We could - what is the advantage of doing that?

@tsalo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tsalo commented Sep 5, 2024

This ties in with #11 (i.e., moving as many preparatory steps out of the rapidtide call as possible), but also I figured that we could plot FC inflation on the confound-denoised data if we do the confound regression separately from rapidtide.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants