Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

documentation for clade naming seems to have fallen behind common practice #43

Open
wpqs opened this issue Jan 11, 2021 · 0 comments
Open
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@wpqs
Copy link

wpqs commented Jan 11, 2021

The documentation states that emerging clades should be named by their major clade followed by the nucleotide mutation whereas commonly variants are named by their amino acid change. In addition the practice of appending a version number to the name (V1) isn't mentioned - see https://docs.nextstrain.org/en/latest/tutorials/SARS-CoV-2/steps/naming_clades.html

@wpqs wpqs added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Jan 11, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant