Can't upload tamper proof resource pack

[MopsTMC]

Please confirm the following.

• I checked the existing issues for duplicate problems
• I have tried resolving the issue using the support portal

What browsers are you seeing the problem on?

Firefox

Describe the bug

I am unable to upload a new version for my resource pack due to required use of anti-tamper measures by Packsquash https://github.com/ComunidadAylas/PackSquash/wiki/Options-files#zip_spec_conformance_level.

Steps to reproduce

1. Generate a resource pack with zip_spec_conformance_level = 'disregard'
2. Attempt to upload it as a primary file for a new version
3. Observer the following error on the bottom right
   Error with multipart data: No pack.mcmeta present for pack file. Tip: Make sure pack.mcmeta is in the root directory of your pack! as seen here:

   code/apps/labrinth/src/validate/resourcepack.rs

   Line 32 in 8c1c557

   "No pack.mcmeta present for pack file. Tip: Make sure pack.mcmeta is in the root directory of your pack!",

Expected behavior

This was not an issue prior to 4 months

Additional context

My resource pack is https://modrinth.com/resourcepack/c4music which in order to abide by C418's usage policy requires such methods to prevent extraction which have been implemented upon request of content moderators since July of 2023

[brawaru]

Not a bug. You are essentially creating a corrupted ZIP file, so it's fully expected that validators won't be able to read it. Unless there is a Rust library that can read corrupt ZIP files the same way Minecraft does, I don't think this is fixable.

[MopsTMC]

Can't disagree. I can't be the only one with this issue though.
I just don't understand the utility of this validator, it's not user friendly for edge cases like this

[Minenash]

If a validator can't read the file, then how does mc?

[Felix14-v2]

Minecraft allows you to load an extremely broken zip archives. A lot of creators use this intentionally to protect their work from stealing.

[Minenash]

One problem I could see with this, is what happens if someone reports a project using this method for copyright infringement. This makes it a lot harder for content moderators to check the pack for stolen content

[Felix14-v2]

I would disagree. In fact, even such protection can be hacked, but for obvious reasons I can only talk about these methods privately. So moderators still can do their work.

[ilyvion]

If Minecraft can read those broken zips, then so could any other Java program, really, using the same method(s). Doesn't seem like a very sturdy protection mechanism.

I guess Modrinth could make use of this fact to examine the zips too, should they want to. 🤷