You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The naming scheme for Docker image labels on Docker Hub may be confusing, e.g. modelhub/keras:1.0.2 may be interpreted as an updated version of keras:1.0.1, but can be a completely different (lower or higher) version of keras with another backend.
I suggest a move to a label scheme which does not imply any versioning in the traditional sense. One suggestion would be to use a simple numerical identifier for the labels, e.g. modelhub/keras:103 and modelhub/keras:237 which can be chosen by the submitting authors.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The naming scheme for Docker image labels on Docker Hub may be confusing, e.g. modelhub/keras:1.0.2 may be interpreted as an updated version of keras:1.0.1, but can be a completely different (lower or higher) version of keras with another backend.
I suggest a move to a label scheme which does not imply any versioning in the traditional sense. One suggestion would be to use a simple numerical identifier for the labels, e.g. modelhub/keras:103 and modelhub/keras:237 which can be chosen by the submitting authors.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: