You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
SSG+SWIM will allow for us to provide weakly-consistent group membership views across an SSG group, but that might not be enough for all use cases -- some services are likely going to require strict ordering of group membership changes.
We should investigate how the RAFT protocol can be integrated into SSG as a consensus component responsible for ordering membership updates.
Our Intel friends have already forked and improved a publicly available Raft implementation, with their fork available here: https://github.com/daos-stack/raft
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In GitLab by @shanedsnyder on Jul 3, 2017, 16:36
SSG+SWIM will allow for us to provide weakly-consistent group membership views across an SSG group, but that might not be enough for all use cases -- some services are likely going to require strict ordering of group membership changes.
We should investigate how the RAFT protocol can be integrated into SSG as a consensus component responsible for ordering membership updates.
Our Intel friends have already forked and improved a publicly available Raft implementation, with their fork available here: https://github.com/daos-stack/raft
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: