Compute Index Workflow of Sentinel Reprocesses Data on Rerun with Extended Time Range Instead of Utilizing Cached Data

[click2cloud-SanchitG]

In which step did you encounter the bug?

Workflow execution

Are you using a local or a remote (AKS) FarmVibes.AI cluster?

Local cluster

Bug description

---

Issue: Compute Index Workflow of Sentinel Reprocesses Data on Rerun with Extended Time Range Instead of Utilizing Cached Data

Link to the notebook: Notebook Link

---

Workflow File spaceeye_index-Sanchit.zip

1. Scenario 1:

• Time Range: (datetime(2021, 1, 1), datetime(2021, 3, 3))
• Workflow File: spaceeye_index-Sanchit.yaml (attached)
• Run Name: SpaceEye and NDVI Timelapse 2021
• Duration: 01:11:54
• Screenshot: (attached)

2. Scenario 2:

• Time Range: (datetime(2021, 1, 1), datetime(2021, 3, 20))
• Workflow File: spaceeye_index-Sanchit.yaml (attached)
• Run Name: SpaceEye and NDVI Timelapse 2021
• Duration: 00:58:59
• Screenshot: (attached)

Observation:

When running the Compute Index workflow for the first time over a specific time range, it processes the data and stores it in the cache. However, when the workflow is run a second time with an extended time range, it starts reprocessing all the data from scratch instead of utilizing the previously cached data.

Problem:

The Compute Index workflow does not appear to leverage cached data when reprocessing. Instead of utilizing the cached results from the initial run, it processes all data again, leading to increased runtime. This issue results in inefficient processing, particularly problematic since this workflow is executed weekly and has been implemented on the customer's side.

---

Steps to reproduce the problem

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Trigger the SpaceEye and NDVI Timelapse 2021 Workflow with the time_range and wf_dict from Scenario 1.
2. Note the duration.
3. Increase the time_range and rerun the workflow with the wf_dict from Scenario 2.
4. Compare the duration.

Expected Behavior:

The workflow in Scenario 2 should complete in less time, proportional to the additional days added, by utilizing the cached data from the initial run.

Environment:

• FarmVibes.AI
• Python Version: 3.11
• Operating System: Ubuntu (cluster environment)

Questions:

1. Why does the workflow take nearly the same duration for the extended time range as it did for the initial range, despite having cached data from the first run?
2. Why is the workflow not utilizing the cached data and processing only the additional days?

Please check this issue as soon as possible, as our customers are expecting a resolution.

Thanks & Regards,

Sanchit

---