Hi, unfortunately this algorithm is having some exception cases

[HJiashu]

I checked 3, 5, 7, and 11. The algorithm is returning false.
I was hoping the authors would be willing to fix this. By maybe adding some if statements

[JosiahDub]

Do you have source(s) starting definitively that these numbers are prime? I don't want to dive down a rabbit hole based on a random issue.

[SreedevT]

Your test cases are very specific. There are other numbers you know. Try adding them to the test case and see the accuracy go up.. that's all that matters.

[jayar95]

Works on my machine. Have you tried downloading more RAM?

[Acters]

Realistically a failed test case means you already know it is a prime number. This code is accurate for ~95% from a certain variety of data. Theoretically this is similar to lim(x->∞) f(x) for ~100% accuracy. The more variety of data included, the more accurate the result is for the broad set.

[PalmDevs]

Unfortunately, I cannot reproduce this issue on my 🚀 RTX 4090 Ti 🚀 bought by my ✨ AMERICAN EXPRESS PLATINUM CARD ✨ for some reason. Have you tried this on the 🚀 RTX 4090 Ti 🚀? If that still doesn't work, try with one bought by the ✨ AMERICAN EXPRESS PLATINUM CARD ✨. Thank you.

Let's be real for a second. We all don't have the RTX 4090 Ti, nor the American Express Platinum card.

[SreedevT]

Unfortunately, I cannot reproduce this issue on my 🚀 RTX 4090 Ti 🚀 bought by my ✨ AMERICAN EXPRESS PLATINUM CARD ✨ for some reason. Have you tried this on the 🚀 RTX 4090 Ti 🚀? If that still doesn't work, try with one bought by the ✨ AMERICAN EXPRESS PLATINUM CARD ✨. Thank you.

Let's be real for a second. We all don't have the RTX 4090 Ti, nor the American Express Platinum card.

@Wwinter-Ttree might be of the poor variety in which case I might be able to represent. I tried to reproduce this in my athlon processor and it didn't show anything. Literally, nothing. I think it finally died. But hey I couldn't reproduce the test either that must mean it doesn't exist.