We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Please see https://evil32.com/ (note: site will not damage your computer :-P) for why it is important to begin using key IDs bigger than 32 bits.
I notice that in documentation such as docs/getting-started/APT-packages-raspbian.asciidoc 32-bit key IDs are being used.
As far as I understand it, gpg and apt-key adv will both know how to use 64-bit key IDs, but I haven't verified this.
While I'm asking, is this the proper key?
pub 2048R/31B5958F43DDF224 2016-02-28 uid Machinekit Signer <[email protected]> sub 2048R/9AF25B185CFD4136 2016-02-28 sub 2048D/F81BD2B7499BE968 2016-02-29
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dockerfile: Use 64-bit key ID
1200577
See machinekit/machinekit-docs#239
dd69f27
4905b74
001b479
No branches or pull requests
Please see https://evil32.com/ (note: site will not damage your computer :-P) for why it is important to begin using key IDs bigger than 32 bits.
I notice that in documentation such as docs/getting-started/APT-packages-raspbian.asciidoc 32-bit key IDs are being used.
As far as I understand it, gpg and apt-key adv will both know how to use 64-bit key IDs, but I haven't verified this.
While I'm asking, is this the proper key?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: