Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The nostalgic pizza cutter #71

Open
tsujan opened this issue May 28, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

The nostalgic pizza cutter #71

tsujan opened this issue May 28, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@tsujan
Copy link
Member

tsujan commented May 28, 2022

I think I saw it when testing initial versions of LXQt. Its link can be removed from README: https://github.com/lxqt/lxqt-themes/tree/master/graphics#readme

@yan12125
Copy link
Member

I don't know those are pizza cutters until today :) An user thought it's a "sword coming out of a sheath" (excerpted from #lxqt IRC, timezone UTC+8)

2022-05-13 09:10:00	edwinHernndez[m]	Hi everyone can someone tell me where can I find 0.8.0 start menu icon? It's the sword coming out of a sheath.
2022-05-13 09:31:05	+yan12125	edwinHernndez[m]: looks like current icons are all birds. You can find old icons from git: https://github.com/lxqt/lxqt-common-deprecated/blob/0.8.0/themes/ambiance/mainmenu.svg
(...irrelevant messages omitted...)
2022-05-13 10:24:04	edwinHernndez[m]	<yan12125> "edwin Hernández: looks like..." <- Thank you

I'm OK with cleaning up that README file. Some people do want old icons, but that README file does not help.

@stefonarch
Copy link
Member

We could modify the main wiki with some "History" paragraph. That the icon was a pizza cutter I learned in that discussion ;) for me at razor time it was just weird.
We use scissors to cut pizza here - works better :)

@tsujan
Copy link
Member Author

tsujan commented May 29, 2022

LXQt's hummingbird is so lovely :)

@ghost ghost mentioned this issue Sep 2, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants