Specify license

[AgostinoSturaro]

What's the license covering this project?
If nothing is specified, then it legally defaults to "all rights reserved".
Which means nothing useful can be done with it.

In case it should still be decided, what about using

• Apache 2.0 for the code
• CC-BY 4.0 for assets and doc?

It would align it with what LibGDX uses. Basically,

• do what you want with the code
• don't hold the author(s) liable if something breaks
• give credit to the author(s) as the original creators

[badlogic]

seriously, stop or i'll ban you from doing anything with projects under the
libgdx organisation.
On Apr 17, 2014 7:20 PM, "AgostinoSturaro" [email protected] wrote:

What's the license covering this project?
If nothing is specified, then it legally defaults to "all rights reserved".
Which means nothing useful can be done with it.

In case it should still be decided, what about using

• Apache 2.0 http://opensource.org/licenses/Apache-2.0 for the code
• CC-BY 4.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ for assets
  and doc?

It would align it with what LibGDX uses. Basically,

• do what you want with the code
• don't hold the author(s) liable if something breaks
• give credit to the author(s) as the original creators

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/1
.

[AgostinoSturaro]

Ok, sorry.

[JamesMcMahon]

So what license is this project?

It seems like a valid issue.

EDIT: Just noticed that some file have an apache header. It would be nice to have it at the root level. Would you be receptive to a pull request?