Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggestion : Detailed log #3

Open
michoug opened this issue Sep 30, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

Suggestion : Detailed log #3

michoug opened this issue Sep 30, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@michoug
Copy link

michoug commented Sep 30, 2017

Hi,
I was using the software and at some point, I got this warning :

[1] "Plotting OTU contributions..."
[1] "Some OTUs did not have a taxonomy associated. Did you pick against Greengenes 97% or IMG?"
[1] "BugBase analysis complete"

But it doesn't tell me which OTUs are problematic so I don't know if the mistake is due to an issue in the annotation or another error.
Best
Greg

@TonyaWard
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi Greg,

If you picked OTUs using a closed reference approach with either GreenGenes 97% ID references or the IMG database (shotgun only), you should be fine. We will work on updating BugBase to tell you how many OTUs didn't have associated taxonomy.

Thanks for using BugBase!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants