Can't legalize widths between legal widths. #12
Assignees
Labels
Comments
jacobly0
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 11, 2020
CXXDeductionGuideDecl with a local typedef has its own copy of the
TypedefDecl with the CXXDeductionGuideDecl as the DeclContext of that
TypedefDecl.
```
template <typename T> struct A {
typedef T U;
A(U, T);
};
A a{(int)0, (int)0};
```
Related discussion on cfe-dev:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2020-November/067252.html
Without this fix, when we import the CXXDeductionGuideDecl (via
VisitFunctionDecl) then before creating the Decl we must import the
FunctionType. However, the first parameter's type is the afore mentioned
local typedef. So, we then start importing the TypedefDecl whose
DeclContext is the CXXDeductionGuideDecl itself. The infinite loop is
formed.
```
#0 clang::ASTNodeImporter::VisitCXXDeductionGuideDecl(clang::CXXDeductionGuideDecl*) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:3543:0
#1 clang::declvisitor::Base<std::add_pointer, clang::ASTNodeImporter, llvm::Expected<clang::Decl*> >::Visit(clang::Decl*) /home/egbomrt/WORK/llvm5/build/debug/tools/clang/include/clang/AST/DeclNodes.inc:405:0
#2 clang::ASTImporter::ImportImpl(clang::Decl*) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:8038:0
#3 clang::ASTImporter::Import(clang::Decl*) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:8200:0
#4 clang::ASTImporter::ImportContext(clang::DeclContext*) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:8297:0
#5 clang::ASTNodeImporter::ImportDeclContext(clang::Decl*, clang::DeclContext*&, clang::DeclContext*&) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:1852:0
#6 clang::ASTNodeImporter::ImportDeclParts(clang::NamedDecl*, clang::DeclContext*&, clang::DeclContext*&, clang::DeclarationName&, clang::NamedDecl*&, clang::SourceLocation&) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:1628:0
#7 clang::ASTNodeImporter::VisitTypedefNameDecl(clang::TypedefNameDecl*, bool) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:2419:0
#8 clang::ASTNodeImporter::VisitTypedefDecl(clang::TypedefDecl*) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:2500:0
#9 clang::declvisitor::Base<std::add_pointer, clang::ASTNodeImporter, llvm::Expected<clang::Decl*> >::Visit(clang::Decl*) /home/egbomrt/WORK/llvm5/build/debug/tools/clang/include/clang/AST/DeclNodes.inc:315:0
#10 clang::ASTImporter::ImportImpl(clang::Decl*) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:8038:0
#11 clang::ASTImporter::Import(clang::Decl*) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:8200:0
#12 llvm::Expected<clang::TypedefNameDecl*> clang::ASTNodeImporter::import<clang::TypedefNameDecl>(clang::TypedefNameDecl*) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:165:0
#13 clang::ASTNodeImporter::VisitTypedefType(clang::TypedefType const*) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:1304:0
#14 clang::TypeVisitor<clang::ASTNodeImporter, llvm::Expected<clang::QualType> >::Visit(clang::Type const*) /home/egbomrt/WORK/llvm5/build/debug/tools/clang/include/clang/AST/TypeNodes.inc:74:0
#15 clang::ASTImporter::Import(clang::QualType) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:8071:0
#16 llvm::Expected<clang::QualType> clang::ASTNodeImporter::import<clang::QualType>(clang::QualType const&) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:179:0
#17 clang::ASTNodeImporter::VisitFunctionProtoType(clang::FunctionProtoType const*) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:1244:0
#18 clang::TypeVisitor<clang::ASTNodeImporter, llvm::Expected<clang::QualType> >::Visit(clang::Type const*) /home/egbomrt/WORK/llvm5/build/debug/tools/clang/include/clang/AST/TypeNodes.inc:47:0
#19 clang::ASTImporter::Import(clang::QualType) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:8071:0
#20 llvm::Expected<clang::QualType> clang::ASTNodeImporter::import<clang::QualType>(clang::QualType const&) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:179:0
#21 clang::QualType clang::ASTNodeImporter::importChecked<clang::QualType>(llvm::Error&, clang::QualType const&) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:198:0
#22 clang::ASTNodeImporter::VisitFunctionDecl(clang::FunctionDecl*) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:3313:0
#23 clang::ASTNodeImporter::VisitCXXDeductionGuideDecl(clang::CXXDeductionGuideDecl*) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:3543:0
```
The fix is to first create the TypedefDecl and only then start to import
the DeclContext.
Basically, we could do this during the import of all other Decls (not
just for typedefs). But it seems, there is only one another AST
construct that has a similar cycle: a struct defined as a function
parameter:
```
int struct_in_proto(struct data_t{int a;int b;} *d);
```
In that case, however, we had decided to return simply with an error
back then because that seemed to be a very rare construct.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92209
Closed
jacobly0
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 8, 2022
We experienced some deadlocks when we used multiple threads for logging using `scan-builds` intercept-build tool when we used multiple threads by e.g. logging `make -j16` ``` (gdb) bt #0 0x00007f2bb3aff110 in __lll_lock_wait () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 #1 0x00007f2bb3af70a3 in pthread_mutex_lock () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 #2 0x00007f2bb3d152e4 in ?? () #3 0x00007ffcc5f0cc80 in ?? () #4 0x00007f2bb3d2bf5b in ?? () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 #5 0x00007f2bb3b5da27 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #6 0x00007f2bb3b5dbe0 in exit () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #7 0x00007f2bb3d144ee in ?? () #8 0x746e692f706d742f in ?? () #9 0x692d747065637265 in ?? () #10 0x2f653631326b3034 in ?? () #11 0x646d632e35353532 in ?? () #12 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () ``` I think the gcc's exit call caused the injected `libear.so` to be unloaded by the `ld`, which in turn called the `void on_unload() __attribute__((destructor))`. That tried to acquire an already locked mutex which was left locked in the `bear_report_call()` call, that probably encountered some error and returned early when it forgot to unlock the mutex. All of these are speculation since from the backtrace I could not verify if frames 2 and 3 are in fact corresponding to the `libear.so` module. But I think it's a fairly safe bet. So, hereby I'm releasing the held mutex on *all paths*, even if some failure happens. PS: I would use lock_guards, but it's C. Reviewed-by: NoQ Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118439
nebulatgs
pushed a commit
to nebulatgs/llvm-project
that referenced
this issue
Mar 23, 2022
We experienced some deadlocks when we used multiple threads for logging using `scan-builds` intercept-build tool when we used multiple threads by e.g. logging `make -j16` ``` (gdb) bt #0 0x00007f2bb3aff110 in __lll_lock_wait () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 jacobly0#1 0x00007f2bb3af70a3 in pthread_mutex_lock () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 jacobly0#2 0x00007f2bb3d152e4 in ?? () jacobly0#3 0x00007ffcc5f0cc80 in ?? () jacobly0#4 0x00007f2bb3d2bf5b in ?? () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 jacobly0#5 0x00007f2bb3b5da27 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 jacobly0#6 0x00007f2bb3b5dbe0 in exit () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 jacobly0#7 0x00007f2bb3d144ee in ?? () jacobly0#8 0x746e692f706d742f in ?? () jacobly0#9 0x692d747065637265 in ?? () jacobly0#10 0x2f653631326b3034 in ?? () jacobly0#11 0x646d632e35353532 in ?? () jacobly0#12 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () ``` I think the gcc's exit call caused the injected `libear.so` to be unloaded by the `ld`, which in turn called the `void on_unload() __attribute__((destructor))`. That tried to acquire an already locked mutex which was left locked in the `bear_report_call()` call, that probably encountered some error and returned early when it forgot to unlock the mutex. All of these are speculation since from the backtrace I could not verify if frames 2 and 3 are in fact corresponding to the `libear.so` module. But I think it's a fairly safe bet. So, hereby I'm releasing the held mutex on *all paths*, even if some failure happens. PS: I would use lock_guards, but it's C. Reviewed-by: NoQ Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118439 (cherry picked from commit d919d02)
jacobly0
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 4, 2022
For functions that require restoring SP from FP (e.g. that need to
align the stack, or that have variable sized allocations), the prologue
and epilogue previously used to look like this:
push {r4-r5, r11, lr}
add r11, sp, #8
...
sub r4, r11, #8
mov sp, r4
pop {r4-r5, r11, pc}
This is problematic, because this unwinding operation (restoring sp
from r11 - offset) can't be expressed with the SEH unwind opcodes
(probably because this unwind procedure doesn't map exactly to
individual instructions; note the detour via r4 in the epilogue too).
To make unwinding work, the GPR push is split into two; the first one
pushing all other registers, and the second one pushing r11+lr, so that
r11 can be set pointing at this spot on the stack:
push {r4-r5}
push {r11, lr}
mov r11, sp
...
mov sp, r11
pop {r11, lr}
pop {r4-r5}
bx lr
For the same setup, MSVC generates code that uses two registers;
r11 still pointing at the {r11,lr} pair, but a separate register
used for restoring the stack at the end:
push {r4-r5, r7, r11, lr}
add r11, sp, #12
mov r7, sp
...
mov sp, r7
pop {r4-r5, r7, r11, pc}
For cases with clobbered float/vector registers, they are pushed
after the GPRs, before the {r11,lr} pair.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125649
jacobly0
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 4, 2022
Previously, the "add sp, #12" ended up inserted after "bx lr". Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126872
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Repro
-O1Since that doesn't repro anymore, here's a direct repro:
C repro
-O0:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: