Add to database the new relations from Datacite 4.5

[rija]

User story

As a curator
I want to make use of the new types of relations between dataset introduced in the newer version of Datacite schema
So that I can create semantically richer relationships between datasets

Acceptance criteria

Given I have two datasets that I want to relate
When I go the admin page for dataset relations
Then I can choose a relation to connect to the dataset
And the list of relations includes those from the DataCite schema version 4.5

Additional Info

this is a followup to #1959
because the main codebase is still using an old version of Datacite schema,
we cannot yet add vocabulary from a newer version, otherwise the process triggered by Mint DOI
will throw a validation error

list of relationships:
https://datacite-metadata-schema.readthedocs.io/en/4.5/appendices/appendix-1/relationType/

This is dependent on the following tasks to be done:

• Improve DataCite creator metadata by migrating to newer version of the schema #456

Product Backlog Item Ready Checklist

• Business value is clearly articulated
• Item is understood enough by the IT team so it can make an informed decision as to whether it can complete this item
• Dependencies are identified and no external dependencies would block this item from being completed
• At the time of the scheduled sprint, the IT team has the appropriate composition to complete this item
• This item is estimated and small enough to comfortably be completed in one sprint
• Acceptance criteria are clear and testable
• Performance criteria, if any, are defined and testable
• The Scrum team understands how to demonstrate this item at the sprint review

Product Backlog Item Done Checklist

• Item(s) in increment pass all Acceptance Criteria
• Code is refactored to best practices and coding standards
• Documentation is updated as needed
• Data security has not been compromised (with particular reference to the personal information we hold in GigaDB)
• No deviation from the team technology stack and software architecture has been introduced
• The product is in a releasable state (i.e. the increment has not broken anything)

[alli83]

Is this ticket regarding the creation of a distinct form to be able to create, modify, delete relationships in database?

[only1chunts]

@alli83 the intension of this ticket is to get the terms in the database to be able to be used in the Dataset:Relationship form. I dont know how much extra work it is to create a form to administer the relationship terms, if its simple & quick, then yes why not, but I suspect thats fair amount of additional work and its not a priority right now (the list of relationship terms will not change very often so the need for a curator to be able to change them is very low)