Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enable Async Backing #328

Open
tonimateos opened this issue Feb 1, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Enable Async Backing #328

tonimateos opened this issue Feb 1, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
Grooming Needed Extra attention is needed Sprint Candidate Proposed by PO for the very next sprint

Comments

@tonimateos
Copy link
Contributor

tonimateos commented Feb 1, 2024

As a LAOS dev team I want to have asyn backing so the block production is faster and so that hardhat issues are solved

ACCEPTANCE:

  • Block production is 6 instead 12 seconds
  • Currently vesting of tokens continue to vest over the expected timeframe (not blockframe)
  • Election duration, referenda, voting, also remains the same (timeframe, not blockframe)
@tonimateos tonimateos added the Sprint Candidate Proposed by PO for the very next sprint label Feb 1, 2024
@tonimateos tonimateos removed the Sprint Candidate Proposed by PO for the very next sprint label Feb 15, 2024
@tonimateos tonimateos changed the title Break down Async-backing into User Stories Enable Async Backing Oct 24, 2024
@tonimateos tonimateos linked a pull request Oct 24, 2024 that will close this issue
@tonimateos tonimateos added Grooming Needed Extra attention is needed Sprint Candidate Proposed by PO for the very next sprint labels Oct 24, 2024
@asiniscalchi asiniscalchi self-assigned this Oct 24, 2024
@asiniscalchi
Copy link
Member

it seems the way to go is a migration to set the new params of pallet vesting

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Grooming Needed Extra attention is needed Sprint Candidate Proposed by PO for the very next sprint
Projects
Status: In Progress
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants