-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
3rd Community Review of BDX Allocator #191
Comments
@cryptoAmandaL 1st Review score: 2.5PiB granted 0.5 PiB granted to existing clients:
2 PiB granted to new clients:
Example 1 - issue 8 I would like to point out, however, that the 3 previous CID reports were rather bad and the allocation of 512TiB seems to be unjustified. Additionally, this dataset has already appeared multiple times in filecoin. The allocator should have checked and clarified these issues before granting the first allocation:
Example 2 - issue 22 The dataset was stored multiple times:
SPs provided:
Additional SPs used for deals: The client updated the SP list after receiving the DC, so the SP list used for deals does not match the SP list provided in the form.
After the second tranche, only 2 SPs improved their results significantly, but the allocator considered that the results improved and that cooperation could continue. Considering the allocator's comment and report analysis, I don't understand where the significant increase was observed.
|
First Review #20
Second Review #142
Latest Allocator Compliance Review https://compliance.allocator.tech/report/f03018484/1728866648/report.md
Given 2.5PiBs
DataCap was given to:
cryptoAmandaL/BDE-Allocator#22 (2PiB)
cryptoAmandaL/BDE-Allocator#8 (0.5PiB)
#22
After KYC and the first round allocation, we found the retrieval success rate to be poor.
Then we have communicated with clients on this issue and get a response from this client. We decided to give him a chance to wait for sps' improvement.
When cid bot showed that client use more than 75% datacap, I got a new report.
Compared with two results in reports, we've seen a significant increase in the success rate of sps' retrieval. So we decided to give them a new round of allocation.
#8
Compared with two results in reports, the retrieval success rate is decreasing. Client's sps are currently not capable of improving retrieval rates in a short time. So we closed this application and stop the work with this client.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: