Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

enforce/optional check for canonical CBOR in response #753

Open
nooobcoder opened this issue Mar 13, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

enforce/optional check for canonical CBOR in response #753

nooobcoder opened this issue Mar 13, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees
@iirachek
Labels
DONE Has been implemented as part of one of the published releases Enhancement Improvements to the existing functionality

Comments

@nooobcoder
Copy link

nooobcoder commented Mar 13, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Can check for response CBOR being canonically correct in the next release? If not enforce, can check be added to check for the same to do it optionally?
@nooobcoder
Copy link
Author

Links to #445

@iirachek iirachek added the Enhancement Improvements to the existing functionality label Apr 17, 2024
@iirachek
Copy link

Will see if it can be implemented in the next release, but it is low priority.

@iirachek iirachek self-assigned this Apr 17, 2024
@iirachek iirachek added the Awaiting Release Is ready and is awaiting merge for the next release label Aug 7, 2024
@iirachek iirachek added DONE Has been implemented as part of one of the published releases and removed Awaiting Release Is ready and is awaiting merge for the next release labels Sep 20, 2024
@iirachek
Copy link

Check for authenticator replies being a canonical CBOR got added in v1.7.21

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@iirachek iirachek

Labels
DONE Has been implemented as part of one of the published releases Enhancement Improvements to the existing functionality
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@iirachek @nooobcoder