Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EthStorage Devs Meeting #96 Agenda #118

Closed
qzhodl opened this issue Sep 2, 2024 · 10 comments
Closed

EthStorage Devs Meeting #96 Agenda #118

qzhodl opened this issue Sep 2, 2024 · 10 comments

Comments

@qzhodl
Copy link
Contributor

qzhodl commented Sep 2, 2024

Meeting Info

  • Sep 03, 2024, 11:00 UTC+8
  • Duration: 60 minutes
  • Meeting link
  • Anyone can comment on the agenda where they would like this to be discussed.

Agenda

  • Protocol/App/Research progress
  • BD/Marketing progress
@blockchaindevsh
Copy link
Contributor

  1. follow Mark's holocene spec, it seems the scope is greatly reduced(changes related to inbox is gone in the latest spec).
  2. investigating op-programe to analyze the impact of dynamic inbox for FP.

@iteyelmp
Copy link

iteyelmp commented Sep 3, 2024

  1. FlatDirectory supports optimization blob.
  2. Optimize the FlatDirectory contract to support batch acquisition of chunk hashes and one-time acquisition of relevant parameters required for uploaded files.
  3. Migrate ethstorage-sdk to typescript language.
  4. Migrate ethfs-cli to typescript language.

@ping-ke
Copy link

ping-ke commented Sep 3, 2024

@Akagi201
Copy link

Akagi201 commented Sep 3, 2024

  • Deploy taiko node and raiko prover to understand based rollup.node prover
  • Continue adding mainnet block tests to blockstm.

@qizhou
Copy link
Contributor

qizhou commented Sep 3, 2024

@GrapeBaBa
Copy link
Contributor

@dajuguan
Copy link
Contributor

dajuguan commented Sep 3, 2024

@qzhodl
Copy link
Contributor Author

qzhodl commented Sep 3, 2024

@qzhodl qzhodl closed this as completed Sep 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

9 participants