Replies: 1 comment 3 replies
-
It sounds like a cool idea, I've thought about a similar concept before, but never got around doing it... I'd love to see your take on it though! 👀 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hello,
First thanks for these awesome library(ies).
I was thinking about to create a more general package for ws subscriptions based on this protocol without any relation to graphql. Looking at the implementation of the server code the graphql code dependency can be removed which only leaves 2 required functions:
execute
andsubscribe
for handling the incoming subscriptions/requests.The general use-case could be that additional tools like trpc or any other similar packages can re-use these packages.
Wonder what your thoughts are @enisdenjo .
PS: I am willing to contribute/rewrite.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions